public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] frange: dump hex values when dumping FP numbers.
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 23:04:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyzN2XphM4ZuvgYh@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220922164911.2566143-1-aldyh@redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:49:10PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> It has been suggested that if we start bumping numbers by an ULP when
> calculating open ranges (for example the numbers less than 3.0) that
> dumping these will become increasingly harder to read, and instead we
> should opt for the hex representation.  I still find the floating
> point representation easier to read for most numbers, but perhaps we
> could have both?
> 
> With this patch this is the representation for [15.0, 20.0]:
> 
>      [frange] float [1.5e+1 (0x0.fp+4), 2.0e+1 (0x0.ap+5)]
> 
> Would you find this useful, or should we stick to the hex
> representation only (or something altogether different)?

I think dumping both is the way to go, but real_to_hexadecimal doesn't
do anything useful with decimal floats, so that part should be
guarded on !DECIMAL_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type).

Why do you build a tree + dump_generic_node for decimal instead of
real_to_decimal_for_mode ?
The former I think calls:
            char string[100];
            real_to_decimal (string, &d, sizeof (string), 0, 1);
so perhaps:
  char s[100];
  real_to_decimal_for_mode (s, &r, sizeof (string), 0, 1, TYPE_MODE (type));
  pp_string (pp, "%s", s);
  if (!DECIMAL_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type))
    {
      real_to_hexadecimal (s, &r, sizeof (s), 0, 1);
      pp_printf (pp, " (%s)", s);
    }
?

	Jakub


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-22 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-22 16:49 Aldy Hernandez
2022-09-22 16:49 ` [PATCH] frange: drop endpoints to min/max representable numbers for -ffinite-math-only Aldy Hernandez
2022-09-23  7:03   ` Richard Biener
2022-09-23  7:21     ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-09-23  7:51       ` Richard Biener
2022-09-22 19:23 ` [PATCH] frange: dump hex values when dumping FP numbers Toon Moene
2022-09-22 19:25 ` Jeff Law
2022-09-22 21:04 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-09-23  6:56   ` Aldy Hernandez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyzN2XphM4ZuvgYh@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).