From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F2A3858D3C for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:02:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D7F2A3858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679436128; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-to:resent-from:resent-message-id: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DESsNyCpqdiu3xe6xrYFZeOasFTQL0WYXRJwujA4szs=; b=A1G8vfaCPxTDCdHhrRyS7/dLayzhNZDsZnx1tnkPZlylfvNfBnrv6xWccPcAAxiD9No2B9 p9/034VZwy21ostFXvX6BS95NZaTiI7mgJ9b/sVOcCLCoc7rDvuPtNpnbl9ksDlZi9z6dq Vc+mso5sSrzUl79Xp73Q7KsIKPJ/dI4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-297-z_yyEJl9PEWQNWVXUyBoVA-1; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:02:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: z_yyEJl9PEWQNWVXUyBoVA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8ED3822DE8; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03CBE2027047; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 32LM214K1200920 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:02:01 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 32LM216K1200919; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:02:01 +0100 Resent-From: Jakub Jelinek Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 23:02:00 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-To: Jeff Law , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:12:10 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Qing Zhao Cc: Jeff Law , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: Should -ffp-contract=off the default on GCC? Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <87384938-FDB1-487B-8B03-7787996435B2@comcast.net> <7C6B7ED7-7AA4-47EF-8E44-E3AD81BF3E29@oracle.com> <4a670847-9728-e0cb-46f3-d476839f7cd4@gmail.com> <9787B47E-9800-47B1-B98D-60430257C4E5@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9787B47E-9800-47B1-B98D-60430257C4E5@oracle.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:01:36PM +0000, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote: > In addition to this, Standards have been changed from time to time. So, the user needs to know the standard they are compiling for. Anyway, talking again about contractions, it isn't anything new in the standard, C99 had those too. Jakub