public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
	Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>,
	chip.kerchner@ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH, V3] PR target/70243 - Do not generate vmaddfp or vnmsubdp
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 09:34:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDFte7XxGH3P2fpq@toto.the-meissners.org> (raw)

This is version 3 of the patch.  This is essentially version 1 with the removal
of changes to altivec.md, and cleanup of the comments.

Version 2 generated the vmaddfp and vnmsubfp instructions if -Ofast was used,
and those changes are deleted in this patch.

The Altivec instructions vmaddfp and vnmsubfp have different rounding behaviors
than the VSX xvmaddsp and xvnmsubsp instructions.  In particular, generating
these instructions seems to break Eigen on big endian systems.

I have done bootstrap builds on power9 little endian (with both IEEE long
double and IBM long double).  I have also done the builds and test on a power8
big endian system (testing both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation).  Chip has
verified that it fixes the problem that Eigen encountered.  Can I check this
into the master GCC branch?  After a burn-in period, can I check this patch
into the active GCC branches?

Thanks in advance.

2023-04-07   Michael Meissner  <meissner@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/

	PR target/70243
	* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (vsx_fmav4sf4): Do not generate vmaddfp.
	(vsx_nfmsv4sf4): Do not generate vnmsubfp.

gcc/testsuite/

	PR target/70243
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md                   | 31 ++++++++--------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
index 0865608f94a..c4c503cacad 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
@@ -2009,22 +2009,20 @@ (define_insn "*vsx_tsqrt<mode>2_internal"
   "x<VSv>tsqrt<sd>p %0,%x1"
   [(set_attr "type" "<VStype_simple>")])
 
-;; Fused vector multiply/add instructions. Support the classical Altivec
-;; versions of fma, which allows the target to be a separate register from the
-;; 3 inputs.  Under VSX, the target must be either the addend or the first
-;; multiply.
-
+;; Fused vector multiply/add instructions. Do not generate the Altivec versions
+;; of fma (vmaddfp and vnmsubfp).  These instructions allows the target to be a
+;; separate register from the 3 inputs, but they have different rounding
+;; behaviors than the VSX instructions.
 (define_insn "*vsx_fmav4sf4"
-  [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa,wa,v")
+  [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa,wa")
 	(fma:V4SF
-	  (match_operand:V4SF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "%wa,wa,v")
-	  (match_operand:V4SF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa,0,v")
-	  (match_operand:V4SF 3 "vsx_register_operand" "0,wa,v")))]
+	  (match_operand:V4SF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "%wa,wa")
+	  (match_operand:V4SF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa,0")
+	  (match_operand:V4SF 3 "vsx_register_operand" "0,wa")))]
   "VECTOR_UNIT_VSX_P (V4SFmode)"
   "@
    xvmaddasp %x0,%x1,%x2
-   xvmaddmsp %x0,%x1,%x3
-   vmaddfp %0,%1,%2,%3"
+   xvmaddmsp %x0,%x1,%x3"
   [(set_attr "type" "vecfloat")])
 
 (define_insn "*vsx_fmav2df4"
@@ -2066,18 +2064,17 @@ (define_insn "*vsx_nfma<mode>4"
   [(set_attr "type" "<VStype_mul>")])
 
 (define_insn "*vsx_nfmsv4sf4"
-  [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa,wa,v")
+  [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa,wa")
 	(neg:V4SF
 	 (fma:V4SF
-	   (match_operand:V4SF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "%wa,wa,v")
-	   (match_operand:V4SF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa,0,v")
+	   (match_operand:V4SF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "%wa,wa")
+	   (match_operand:V4SF 2 "vsx_register_operand" "wa,0")
 	   (neg:V4SF
-	     (match_operand:V4SF 3 "vsx_register_operand" "0,wa,v")))))]
+	     (match_operand:V4SF 3 "vsx_register_operand" "0,wa")))))]
   "VECTOR_UNIT_VSX_P (V4SFmode)"
   "@
    xvnmsubasp %x0,%x1,%x2
-   xvnmsubmsp %x0,%x1,%x3
-   vnmsubfp %0,%1,%2,%3"
+   xvnmsubmsp %x0,%x1,%x3"
   [(set_attr "type" "vecfloat")])
 
 (define_insn "*vsx_nfmsv2df4"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..18a5ce78792
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/* { dg-do compile */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
+
+/* PR 70423, Make sure we don't generate vmaddfp or vnmsubfp.  These
+   instructions have different rounding modes than the VSX instructions
+   xvmaddsp and xvnmsubsp.  These tests are written where the 3 inputs and
+   target are all separate registers.  Because vmaddfp and vnmsubfp are no
+   longer generated the compiler will have to generate an xsmaddsp or xsnmsubsp
+   instruction followed by a move operation.  */
+
+#include <altivec.h>
+
+vector float
+do_add1 (vector float dummy, vector float a, vector float b, vector float c)
+{
+  return (a * b) + c;
+}
+
+vector float
+do_nsub1 (vector float dummy, vector float a, vector float b, vector float c)
+{
+  return -((a * b) - c);
+}
+
+vector float
+do_add2 (vector float dummy, vector float a, vector float b, vector float c)
+{
+  return vec_madd (a, b, c);
+}
+
+vector float
+do_nsub2 (vector float dummy, vector float a, vector float b, vector float c)
+{
+  return vec_nmsub (a, b, c);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler     {\mxvmadd[am]sp\M}  } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler     {\mxvnmsub[am]sp\M} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mvmaddfp\M}       } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mvnmsubfp\M}      } } */
-- 
2.39.2


-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meissner@linux.ibm.com

             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-08 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-08 13:34 Michael Meissner [this message]
2023-04-08 14:01 ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZDFte7XxGH3P2fpq@toto.the-meissners.org \
    --to=meissner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chip.kerchner@ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).