public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Thomas Koenig via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR37336 finalization
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 00:32:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHrso8vS/hKPaFEY@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552d5ed3-d137-b9dd-7b67-e561070aa001@netcologne.de>

On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:50:19AM +0200, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> > I propose to backport
> > r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee to 12-branch very
> > soon.
> 
> Is this something that we usually do?
> 
> While finalization was basically broken before, some people still used
> working subsets (or subsets that were broken, and they adapted or
> wrote their code accordingly).
> 
> What is the general opinion on that?  I'm undecided.
> 

I think a backport that fixes a bug that is a violation
of Fortran standard is always okay.  A backport of anything
else is up to the discretion of the contributor.  If pault
or you or harald or ... want to backport a patch, after all
these years, I think we should trust their judgement.

-- 
Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-03  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07 13:45 Paul Richard Thomas
2023-03-07 14:58 ` Thomas Koenig
2023-03-07 17:15   ` Steve Kargl
2023-06-02 13:42 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-06-03  5:50   ` Thomas Koenig
2023-06-03  7:32     ` Steve Kargl [this message]
2023-06-03 13:16     ` Paul Richard Thomas
2023-06-03 19:10       ` Harald Anlauf
2023-06-03 19:10         ` Harald Anlauf
2023-06-03 19:22       ` Thomas Koenig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZHrso8vS/hKPaFEY@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    --to=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).