From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1803E3858CDB for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 20:30:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1803E3858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1690317017; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RS891CMFfxcSrf/suPwPUwbVRdRM87AbxIUmVvQgoTY=; b=DJW5swCohHI7EEcdaCXkUMcMY0rFN49e8iaLYHvFFrpWEa1AFhWEk9Jqnjq5gquYgC3jIs QSAalqGX+3mgP/h+2lNVH9rjPli138m7U+jI04/yVU2INrRU2OZF+qE6gUBZOxOLo9PmYK boRbByQa+6WRWePtfb8GcFieRTqneOI= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-442-z0dpfO6GM6Sy-iet58a5PQ-1; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:30:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: z0dpfO6GM6Sy-iet58a5PQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-403fc19a7a7so68017381cf.0 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:30:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690317015; x=1690921815; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RS891CMFfxcSrf/suPwPUwbVRdRM87AbxIUmVvQgoTY=; b=FlZe5/Iajaj9nYZWPiDjuWbrd7t/fz9ioWThHTKLsGhBootUz7ThfSXgTA69lv4Sw2 wtIUPAvArIFxUdIJ7vsHMR8ODOlykpkiXVPZCZeQcdNjcdDRkNV5Uzr+vivyOmgUvUaF vUS1MQ+FZaM9sp0F4NiCIY2dLFy5mrV6CBIDbt1ztZrRQlIWjqecKfkdSHoFQYlBZN1l 00tQyQ5y5C6vorzTis1sXJ2W39DovQqPLrndEVsgNij/y811xlMB22XDIR8IWDMZsZeG p4cLsc+eY7nFWq8u5pc2Ql7pb1tUyCuFWtP7EM96+pM02agiYCC2742XVtKYBC+D8fwH 4nKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbqgLiHh7IgxCPjekG/vMC2VXKELPLxOaXRrrj6FYDwwAT4S4l8 9oGiwv0suhhBuFvFNlroin7U+qhM3D9hHZFR0QrLSbrcpOB+9dL2NKiJYeGhMM3oP5i0IPb/n1d zgbSR/95wrISJQ0L0Tg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5d0:b0:3dc:fa58:97fd with SMTP id d16-20020a05622a05d000b003dcfa5897fdmr60585qtb.25.1690317015797; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHXGihE/t7kBF2U7tM6S8sEe3FbK48SmAMJyHoog78bmGfZ5uVWwD6ASKm+z79QeEd2uRXz5g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5d0:b0:3dc:fa58:97fd with SMTP id d16-20020a05622a05d000b003dcfa5897fdmr60567qtb.25.1690317015577; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (2603-7000-9500-34a5-0000-0000-0000-1db4.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:7000:9500:34a5::1db4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15-20020ac875cf000000b004036ec58b11sm4254747qtq.84.2023.07.25.13.30.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 13:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:30:12 -0400 From: Marek Polacek To: Jason Merrill Cc: Patrick Palka , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE with is_really_empty_class [PR110106] Message-ID: References: <20230718211458.858343-1-polacek@redhat.com> <7007162f-c356-cbde-575e-1cbbd545323d@idea> <03d798a6-0951-1d11-5ae4-476e85f5636e@redhat.com> <197c642a-a916-5be4-fe9e-2f0710333c92@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:24:39PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 7/25/23 15:59, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Something like this, then? I see that cp_parser_initializer_clause et al > > offer further opportunities (because they sometimes use a dummy too) but > > this should be a good start. > > Looks good. Please do update the other callers as well, while you're > looking at this. Thanks. Can I push this part first?