From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA6B03858401 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:00:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CA6B03858401 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1692802841; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=2YKW1oJmWS803vTH1U1pbAlk83NHwUDDa467MZBj3Vg=; b=NKLOeiiPtRgB/tujxtNDjePrYNcxg7VQd4Dd8ZxTm2SDRab/NqFintHS7McPxsIdYmhEgp nqIIMu8f6X0mJpPSx94AI8y7zegOcF/PdcvNNyhFI6QvATl/hJJOoKSBGR5K+NVOWUCQe2 O22jowfMroUi1wNgyDZZAtZmOg8XZT4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-668-nHWHsaW1PE-C9I-iKIPqsA-1; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 11:00:37 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nHWHsaW1PE-C9I-iKIPqsA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7445B185A792; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.45.225.165]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A89C2026D2B; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:00:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 37NF0YQ12461076 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:00:34 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 37NF0Yqu2461075; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:00:34 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:00:34 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Uros Bizjak , hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping Re: [PATCH 6/12] i386: Enable _BitInt on x86-64 [PR102989] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! Now that Richi has acked all the middle-end _BitInt patches (but am deferring committing those until also the C FE and libgcc patches are approved), I'd like to ping this patch. Thanks! On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > The following patch enables _BitInt support on x86-64, the only > target which has _BitInt specified in psABI. > > 2023-08-09 Jakub Jelinek > > PR c/102989 > * config/i386/i386.cc (classify_argument): Handle BITINT_TYPE. > (ix86_bitint_type_info): New function. > (TARGET_C_BITINT_TYPE_INFO): Redefine. Jakub