From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E033858D28 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:05:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 76E033858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1693213520; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=qn13MIOOjopMPif2/rK1lGXk7DTLq5jxIQxA8IfaHhc=; b=i3762tbCKyPOLpcx9YXNjIDDtmyOToawGIEf6cgosHMmP9to6zKjQppv4DjvhRWuHaf0Cg XFq1iS/R7eqLPEq5e4T3SRcAXFq7q4VYAJOkV13915szB2zLmtzUAc1wE0WEm7H3dxrsQL 20PUsE3ASMMP7j01IFSUnwPlYJYAAyU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-395-e9AFNSUmPyGv7R1Y07RXtg-1; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 05:05:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: e9AFNSUmPyGv7R1Y07RXtg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7996E8D40AC; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.45.224.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F302026D4B; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 37S94vlw3086627 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:05:02 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 37S94nln3086626; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:04:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 11:04:48 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Patch ping^2 Re: [PATCH 0/12] GCC _BitInt support [PR102989] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:24:02PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Jakub Jelinek (12): > expr: Small optimization [PR102989] > lto-streamer-in: Adjust assert [PR102989] > phiopt: Fix phiopt ICE on vops [PR102989] > Middle-end _BitInt support [PR102989] > _BitInt lowering support [PR102989] > i386: Enable _BitInt on x86-64 [PR102989] > ubsan: _BitInt -fsanitize=undefined support [PR102989] > libgcc: Generated tables for _BitInt <-> _Decimal* conversions [PR102989] > libgcc _BitInt support [PR102989] > C _BitInt support [PR102989] > testsuite part 1 for _BitInt support [PR102989] > testsuite part 2 for _BitInt support [PR102989] + C _BitInt incremental fixes [PR102989] + libgcc _BitInt helper documentation [PR102989] I'd like to ping the rest of this patch series. First 3 patches are committed, next 4 are approved with commit waiting for approval of the rest, the 2 testsuite patches are also approved if you don't have further comments on them, the 3 libgcc patches and 2 C _BitInt patches need to be reviewed. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626850.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626851.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626852.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627033.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628141.html Thanks. Jakub