public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <>
To: Jan Hubicka <>
Subject: [PATCH 16/12] _BitInt profile fixes [PR102989]
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 09:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPbV3yNSwdFY6khb@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 03:14:32PM +0200, Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> this patch extends verifier to check that all probabilities and counts are
> initialized if profile is supposed to be present.  This is a bit complicated
> by the posibility that we inline !flag_guess_branch_probability function
> into function with profile defined and in this case we need to stop
> verification.  For this reason I added flag to cfg structure tracking this.

This patch broke a couple of _BitInt tests (in the admittedly still
uncommitted series - still waiting for review of the C FE bits).

Here is a minimal patch to make it work again, though I'm not sure
if in the if_then_else and if_then_if_then_else cases I shouldn't scale
count of the other bbs as well.  if_then method creates
if (COND) new_bb1;
in a middle of some pre-existing bb (with PROB that COND is true), if_then_else
if (COND) new_bb1; else new_bb2;
and if_then_if_then_else
if (COND1) { if (COND2) new_bb2; else new_bb1; }
with PROB1 and PROB2 probabilities that COND1 and COND2 are true.
The lowering happens shortly after IPA.

Ok for trunk with rest of the series?

2023-09-05  Jakub Jelinek  <>

	PR c/102989
	* (bitint_large_huge::if_then_else,
	bitint_large_huge::if_then_if_then_else): Use make_single_succ_edge
	rather than make_edge, initialize bb->count.

--- gcc/	2023-09-04 09:45:37.357004452 +0200
+++ gcc/	2023-09-04 22:53:30.343756938 +0200
@@ -683,9 +683,10 @@ bitint_large_huge::if_then_else (gimple
   e1->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
   e3->probability = prob;
   e1->probability = prob.invert ();
+  bb->count = e1->src->count.apply_probability (prob);
   set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, bb, e1->src);
   set_immediate_dominator (CDI_DOMINATORS, e2->dest, e1->src);
-  edge_true = make_edge (bb, e2->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
+  edge_true = make_single_succ_edge (bb, e2->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
   edge_false = e2;
   m_gsi = gsi_after_labels (bb);
@@ -741,7 +742,8 @@ bitint_large_huge::if_then_if_then_else
   e4->probability = prob2;
   e2->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
   e2->probability = prob2.invert ();
-  e4 = make_edge (bb, e3->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
+  bb->count = e2->src->count.apply_probability (prob2);
+  e4 = make_single_succ_edge (bb, e3->dest, EDGE_FALLTHRU);
   e2 = find_edge (e2->dest, e3->dest);
   edge_true_true = e4;
   edge_true_false = e2;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05  7:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-24 13:14 Check that passes do not forget to define profile Jan Hubicka
2023-08-24 13:20 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-24 15:36   ` Jan Hubicka
2023-08-31  0:15 ` [EXTERNAL] " Eugene Rozenfeld
2023-09-05  7:16 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-10-03 16:56 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-10-04 11:02   ` Jan Hubicka
2023-10-17 10:29     ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-10-17 13:52       ` Jan Hubicka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZPbV3yNSwdFY6khb@tucnak \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).