From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4219E3858D20 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:06:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4219E3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695910014; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=lJJMt3o4i8GMLrVgQ3CDwAkwcf3fR6FqiQtfAKpJXO0=; b=VMtcQzK3tKvJHgZLBJix80+8/1psc4y6htY6ppIjbprxqCYfC6RbEc4j4J8VmJPQyaqNdd P1FD+GEaKeT3go0skQfVmMVcONeYmkk06rhX140KMNRa1SST5pE7ASixMVc7JfvGgDPaCm HfEtktqikJbV+lEG5FLUPzH1uz0UUvI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-642-GckD6apzOKyMoJDClP4_GA-1; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:06:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GckD6apzOKyMoJDClP4_GA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37913185A78E; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.193.202]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8542156A27; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 38SE6oBD2671633 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:06:51 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 38SE6nwk2671632; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:06:49 +0200 Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 16:06:49 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove poly_int_pod Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 10:55:46AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu & x86_64-linux-gnu. Also tested with > Jakub's vec.h patch with the static_asserts uncommented; there were > no errors from poly_int-related stuff. OK to install? LGTM (mostly as the general idea, but didn't see anything wrong in the patch either), please give others a day or so to comment though. Jakub