From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove poly_int_pod
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:14:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRaHdY0xLkL/yRJp@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3dHCocSLtkocT666GcvPdc8Lie=t0LYD6JW+sOGcyKmA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 08:31:47AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > IIRC the primary reason we settled on gcc-4.8.x was RHEL7/Centos7. With
> > RHEL 7 approaching EOL moving the baseline forward would seem to make sense.
> >
> > I'd want to know if this affects folks using SuSE's enterprise distro
> > before actually making the change, but I'm broadly in favor of moving
> > forward it it's not going to have a major impact on users that are using
> > enterprise distros.
>
> We're thinking of making GCC 13 the last major release to officially
> build for SLE12 which
> also uses GCC 4.8, so we'd be fine with doing this for GCC 14.
We'd need to figure out what to do with the OS on gcc{110,112,135} on CFarm,
those are all CentOS 7.9 with gcc 4.8.5. Sure, one possibility would be
to install some DTS gcc if CentOS has one somewhere (though looking around,
/opt/at12.0 already has there gcc 8 from IBM Advanced Toolchain 12).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 9:55 Richard Sandiford
2023-09-28 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-09-28 17:26 ` Jason Merrill
2023-09-28 19:09 ` Jeff Law
2023-09-29 6:31 ` Richard Biener
2023-09-29 8:14 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-10-02 7:47 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2023-10-02 7:50 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZRaHdY0xLkL/yRJp@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).