From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8583858D37 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:57:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1F8583858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1F8583858D37 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699545463; cv=none; b=ww6DtQapojuPuUNOkPrRZP0jb/zjyS/uSzCArLkufjDK6lzmPW+TzPqYik8hgZqdZIECZXBk3pGsfm1m0G0UVsb2G+Jox1dNepDMKlUzczQR5DM7QMu6eootoc9//cmZl1zJlh5v//sS0t62DJ8TsNGx5vV8OcGWeyAtT57nNfE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699545463; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hczw/DKWc7OIK1EOn41TT+Tg0XsppcTvL0GzeVfA0VM=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=kFeOoQ2PYIOR7oFUPGtFryDPuZheVYu0/8jiaokB9HYDFh7Jvg32Riya8xdsV4OiahQs8qXQX3csqB4nCvSGsUgGtxFboWdCuUYjobSCy4vfEgOYkqPvQkp04rSsEc2CvhHz20Min51x0IYQLmP2Fzvnu0R4djf0YpLQ+kmrAuc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1699545461; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qxjNH6GMlLw1Q9hBKDqLmjOFrhAbOUFTxYZ2VvSpLV8=; b=RoHeRAlATDdIqP4GhM/Q52AHEobj2r6bAwsBDKRmssOxkjPkFaWm9jx62EDFUPzneXYeTQ ZlGn9oK4FQlyNZuOd1S8MXn1SDzMRJe8OJIzUPCzrjr6S350WgRn6sK+/tZNRZflQltiq3 9wqWZEfZHhIfdD1BNHH7TxKuiLQVf5Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-126-ksZad4k3Nc-zHuWwCOmMAA-1; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 10:57:38 -0500 X-MC-Unique: ksZad4k3Nc-zHuWwCOmMAA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7486A3C025D9; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F224C492BFA; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3A9FvWPm1115148 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:57:32 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3A9FvU061115147; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:57:30 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:57:30 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Qing Zhao Cc: richard Biener , Joseph Myers , Siddhesh Poyarekar , Martin Uecker , Kees Cook , "isanbard@gmail.com" , GCC Patches Subject: Re: RFC (V2) the proposal to resolve the missing dependency issue for counted_by attribute Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <5B561B7B-ACD9-4378-A771-F1479A87382D@oracle.com> <2D704EB7-B3FE-4280-ACC0-AA0C4236E39F@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2D704EB7-B3FE-4280-ACC0-AA0C4236E39F@oracle.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 03:49:49PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote: > Is it reasonable to add one option to disable the “counted_by” attribute? > (then no insertion of the new .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE into IL). > > The major reason is: some users might want to ignore all the “counted_by” attribute added in the source code, > We need to provide them a way to disable this feature. -D'counted_by(x)=' and/or -D'__counted_by__(x)=' ? Jakub