From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071E73858D1E for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:36:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 071E73858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 071E73858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699522615; cv=none; b=EVXBJxftO5zaomdL4Clt6rlIC03Ej0jZrIvzvyR1bYWAuAIBol71ZacU9r9AwImm5VPuZ9x4AdPFkCmXUSsyQ++lWgbYJ0kStivJna+piXvpIZcHZbHMfnyCfy/jiWo6BcUccZFY3hzzDa6e2W2tlmGck1+bDWu6xMQpBa603Xc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699522615; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4/zkJQmaL0Qng+xZ7GDKpa0hGJnDjENvLOBJFvMgm6A=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=o7uXPZ+n0ETmPc4gFNFggD8WCA/nRDupiVllBtz3sLWZ8ThAwc0BHhNLuMb1zEJsgk8wj1UzCV7PGmI6wYZVXVJs0SDJxSG7c6ToYAYdAV+MaaJjTaXSR9p+tOhAdI8fwItIn2E9ro29eiUB+2nDlYa3ggMuLFnawB9P5iuuhD0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1699522613; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=CVLSBMCF+BkFZINvC0VFK9fD33WbMajUxtrI+6DHzYc=; b=TID3f/E7LB4z8GFE1chw8cQOTjPu03t8QHpK0liNtfpCJk1g7IiA1yxH57xD1DMmAbm0X+ 5rsqsM4bgE2av+69sFsBOd2w3GEP3/jOvnF3/51jVn14hfV8PgaBXNRC8qVNCnczMFv4/8 YKyLEL6cSHo8Lz4QGFBstHwZUa2EegU= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-131-zE2y8uIjMR26v6gnEuPmUg-1; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 04:36:52 -0500 X-MC-Unique: zE2y8uIjMR26v6gnEuPmUg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D398D3C16DCF for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.81]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F841C060AE; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3A99antx2834437 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:36:49 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3A99am4j2834436; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:36:48 +0100 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 10:36:48 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Florian Weimer Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Fix C99 compatibility issues in the x86-64 AVX ABI test suite Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <875y2c8fca.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87pm0j6zkb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pm0j6zkb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 10:33:40AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jakub Jelinek: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 03:55:17PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx/avx-check.h (main): Call > >> __builtin_printf instead of printf. > >> * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx/test_passing_m256.c > >> (fun_check_passing_m256_8_values): Add missing void return > >> type. > >> * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx512f/avx512f-check.h (main): Call > >> __builtin_printf instead of printf. > >> * gcc.target/x86_64/abi/avx512f/test_passing_m512.c > >> (fun_check_passing_m512_8_values): Add missing void return > >> type. > > > > LGTM. > > I should have scrolled down further, there are more fixes required along > the same lines. Still okay? Yes. Jakub