From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B533858C2B for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:45:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F2B533858C2B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org F2B533858C2B Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701812757; cv=none; b=OhI8W5KxDBGlW/V+uKq2K6pH2UYFTOnO1KG9LZBBdr+fwvbJADmsXyDMb/y+g6o8ni4hrDqh387ZYzyVEK7bgMOsgaRi69Ve5gxrNRPpgidEq1N6JfFCYcnpz5jGnNl34KBr8V2jwEeWBjr3rPexDjakr4NjzNZak5GJgf+wP7A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701812757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lFNSq99B3gLs2ciGOkSINLh65srNYou6RM3qVKeBQJ4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=pUflC9FB+wko+X1Uhtid4/Igig8gmKVb+bScLQN+m4OEbQipQtc2B7WOp+i1UJyolAZgev6y1t+D7GGz22KtvD2EGwQXbYkiSQ/EWj5rgkp//bmHwGbaOmg+u9ng+gHSUB0jX8RKHYfTlmLfKLmMNkUaZ+9OFHTEAGvVhNEAT2g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701812755; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=J/MypbWBzLRHHFtGEyMGraxhgoix7PJIIcbWLY1KZIs=; b=QqNaoLXrHRFsdNi734ZarDsSJwzbeskzD15m0zvkJTo/ozUxjqmg+9lWs5WQFOLThH/gDQ cVbvlSnsH8ASLSzjo5WLWuWEq1gZuNWMarwyMTPLRFowAVvgP1uM0cdfuwpMgRRuh50LVw vedjNMyCB/Exqqj/tH6sK+UeCaLmerg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-150-1nH8yr_GPnqTubbuQbFwDw-1; Tue, 05 Dec 2023 16:45:52 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1nH8yr_GPnqTubbuQbFwDw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6A3F8945A5; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.157]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 653B51C060AF; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3B5Ljm1w1483129 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Dec 2023 22:45:49 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3B5LjlID1483128; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 22:45:47 +0100 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 22:45:47 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Indu Bhagat Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, doko@ubuntu.com, sam@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [[PATCH][GCC13] 0/2] Fix combined tree build of GCC 13 with Binutils 2.41 Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20231205213632.947369-1-indu.bhagat@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20231205213632.947369-1-indu.bhagat@oracle.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 01:36:30PM -0800, Indu Bhagat wrote: > To resolve the issue of combined Binutils (2.41) + GCC (13) failing to > install (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108), we will > need some backports. This specific issue is with using --enable-shared > in the combined tree build; it arises due to missing install-* > dependencies in the top-level makefiles. > > I think it makes sense to bring both of the following two commits (from > the trunk) to the GCC13 branch: > > commit eff0e7a4ae31d1e4e64ae37bbc10d073d8579255 > Author: Indu Bhagat > Date: Wed Jan 18 23:17:49 2023 -0800 > toplevel: Makefile.def: add install-strip dependency on libsframe > > > commit dab58c93634bef06fd289f49109b5c370cd5c380 > Author: Indu Bhagat > Date: Tue Nov 15 15:07:04 2022 -0800 > bfd: linker: merge .sframe sections > > This patch set cherry-picks the above two commits to GCC13 branch. The > patches apply cleanly with no conflicts. Won't this break building gcc 13 with in-tree older binutils which don't have libsframe at all? I think binutils 2.39 and older don't have it. Jakub