From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0523858D33 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:12:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DA0523858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DA0523858D33 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701072770; cv=none; b=A+ztYHUrXyXO54A5WmhccSgs5fH8evqELyH7cRSAK14NOem6lB2JCuWuXwT1UAe+bAV0QCcu1hBQkX9C63hCc5+2fr/zestu8OLiej/WaZNfIJFbPgpQd8nmWV2Vj91eisC5rVNaDljjjKujIibltYcSl49EGxF6/Sm3V0Hb4v8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701072770; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Yfp6b3Ju3B2FdRfaqtgf0JpsHiKyiapkcJqKn0ygwlQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=a//MCAaqMHwJ6n8YjOljxdjfhFr1Q5zPpCZx+YUXfZ3/LolvBHbN3RCJ3agqHvkflAo7O3Ut73enM6A29IKHKWNwpkJFrgigkPp8nffmwgAXGXzGvBMCD4ducoeohcfuQeTmIkg97SUL6PmTLutUPW6/5KORZgzqr8fBvcYYWb8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701072768; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=QMgnPTFL+MkJxgwxYSbqUCrdbYCxPf62jE0abxcJxIs=; b=L2ZH1AM7RiI3qiXE0OJQQGP8vEvzk7sansB/9ouMV+SYBR5tIXP21yEyjfAXOjqI2j2M9c aZpLgM1JidePPmpcUYzHWjcHgJicYpnapmeIFX3kV0Zcw9ooYnB8b6h11gcpP4A8m3i467 +BORlsbmKAYEf2o1Yyy19V4R0J+FvTQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-299-RvkXfqhkNzK0yDhC6bXxNQ-1; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 03:12:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: RvkXfqhkNzK0yDhC6bXxNQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92683185A780; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.194.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F5A492BEF; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3AR8CgUt2129298 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:12:43 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3AR8CfsM2129297; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:12:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:12:40 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Tamar Christina Cc: Xi Ruoyao , Segher Boessenkool , David Edelsohn , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Canonicalize copysign (x, -1) back to -abs (x) in the backend [PR112606] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <60b5367881c834d1b0f7377a4f352c7c512e2d37.camel@xry111.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 07:55:52AM +0000, Tamar Christina wrote: > > For POPCOUNT I've introduced recently a way to provide custom expand_* > > function and decide there what optimizations to use, even when it otherwise > > is an integral unary optab ifn. > > > > Oh that sounds interesting, do you have a commit for me to look at? I couldn't > Spot anything obvious in the history. https://gcc.gnu.org/r14-5613 Jakub