public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, Alex Coplan <alex.coplan@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix up __has_extension (cxx_init_captures)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:22:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWWjN0dxBKkIod2F@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWR2PAciDpq+LT+Y@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:58:04AM +0000, Alex Coplan wrote:
> Many thanks both for the reviews, this is now pushed (with Jason's
> above changes implemented) as g:06280a906cb3dc80cf5e07cf3335b758848d488d.

The new test FAILs everywhere with GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,2b
I'm normally using for testing.
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/has-feature.C  -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/jakub/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/has-feature.C:185:2: error: #error 

This is on
#if __has_extension (cxx_init_captures) != CXX11
#error
#endif
Comparing the values with clang++ on godbolt and with what is actually
implemented:
void foo () { auto a = [b = 3]() { return b; }; }
both clang++ and GCC implement init captures as extension already in C++11
(and obviously not in C++98 because lambdas aren't implemented there),
unless -pedantic-errors/-Werror=pedantic, so I think we should change
the FE to match the test rather than the other way around.

Tested on x86_64-linux with
GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26 make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} dg.exp='has-feature.C'"
Ok for trunk?

Making __has_extension return __has_feature for -pedantic-errors and not
for -Werror=pedantic is just weird, but as that is what clang++ implements
and this is for compatibility with it, I can live with it (but perhaps
we should mention it in the documentation).  Note, the warnings/errors
can be changed using pragmas inside of the source, so whether one can
use an extension or not depends on where in the code it is (__extension__
to the rescue if it can be specified around it).
I wonder if the has-feature.C test shouldn't be #included in other 2 tests,
one where -pedantic-errors would be in dg-options and through some macro
tell the file that __has_extension will behave like __has_feature, and
another with -Werror=pedantic to document that the option doesn't change
it.

2023-11-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* cp-objcp-common.cc (cp_feature_table): Evaluate
	__has_extension (cxx_init_captures) to 1 even for -std=c++11.

--- gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc.jj	2023-11-27 17:34:25.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.cc	2023-11-28 08:55:18.868419864 +0100
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static constexpr cp_feature_info cp_feat
   { "cxx_contextual_conversions", { cxx14, cxx98 } },
   { "cxx_decltype_auto", cxx14 },
   { "cxx_aggregate_nsdmi", cxx14 },
-  { "cxx_init_captures", cxx14 },
+  { "cxx_init_captures", { cxx14, cxx11 } },
   { "cxx_generic_lambdas", cxx14 },
   { "cxx_relaxed_constexpr", cxx14 },
   { "cxx_return_type_deduction", cxx14 },


	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-17 14:50 [PATCH v5] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512] Alex Coplan
2023-11-20 22:29 ` Jason Merrill
2023-11-23 17:41   ` Marek Polacek
2023-11-27 10:58     ` Alex Coplan
2023-11-28  8:22       ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-11-28 16:45         ` [PATCH] c++: Fix up __has_extension (cxx_init_captures) Alex Coplan
2023-11-28 17:12           ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-28 17:18             ` Jason Merrill
2023-11-28 17:08         ` Jason Merrill
2023-11-28 16:03 ` [PATCH v5] c-family: Implement __has_feature and __has_extension [PR60512] Thomas Schwinge
2023-11-28 16:53   ` Alex Coplan
2023-11-28 17:08   ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWWjN0dxBKkIod2F@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.coplan@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).