From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97657385AC19 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:23:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 97657385AC19 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 97657385AC19 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701379422; cv=none; b=nmzPxPbYaq2IEbnufQg+7q3AChNKLl6mYOcPpzZy1l9DUZVlaz3uvsf9K8pb3dsBJBGknJIlx8t+ehMVdozo1leJxedkzJRI2rygENit4Hwwe+dwxb5Cc3+e9Mh0ZxxY4ARdo7b1P2vHVLl30H15Qc/+v0Xoan0QQ8V/1aBOSBQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701379422; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VH93tYpLvlvow72zjM0zXkEeM58sAy4OjNtGsl5PuFI=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=IkXepjiUAlRnW9U38j1xBSCBWjGBAK9iAyqpfjpbtk5MIkXt8BuUsTkVpr82kmIK8FN1N8fVFo2vThoXcMVuNYsynTGCVz4CfTwdv/ClgGMCoc5yBBC8Oah+H4szuaCuEDtA9PyMF3mABQlfwuyrBQVFD2W95lPNqeiB5wH25Lw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701379420; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=0+lUxcDkhKgiG8qhPGOI/wjYy6cvRqdSqoyp5WsF0OE=; b=C7JtMQbxNhuAtOEAStHBcH+fglHAl9gZ3jV1sfOOX4LJocO6gCoRHZ5hVZZJ2NqlQJcX3o KbA1HEzvcuRdqH7wCyfG4DjilYmF40Dcozy/ONNTAud5R5X3QzyPA9gEyYOIHiumSXtLrg pMIXUn8DywI6+r/J1undAY+hyup5t4w= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-107-nTBymg-eMJugdanhOeQfow-1; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:23:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: nTBymg-eMJugdanhOeQfow-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223701013882 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.195.157]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39ECC15884; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 3AULNass2023206 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:23:36 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 3AULNZCc2023205; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:23:35 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:23:35 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Marek Polacek Cc: Florian Weimer , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] c: Turn -Wincompatible-pointer-types into a permerror Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <9e40a64880a14cf27d788ecbaf23365b9a5ac069.1700473918.git.fweimer@redhat.com> <87leafrloc.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 04:15:26PM -0500, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:11:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Marek Polacek: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 10:56:36AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > >> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi > > >> @@ -6183,6 +6183,7 @@ that have their own flag: > > >> @gccoptlist{ > > >> -Wimplicit-function-declaration @r{(C)} > > >> -Wimplicit-int @r{(C)} > > >> +-Wincompatible-pointer-types @r{(C)} > > >> -Wint-conversion @r{(C)} > > >> -Wnarrowing @r{(C++)} > > >> -Wreturn-mismatch @r{(C)} > > > > > > BTW, should the C ones mention Objective-C as well? > > > > Isn't there Objective-C++ as well? I assumed it applied to both > > dialects. > > I think we usually spell both, if they apply. But you can leave it as it is. Seems we use (C and Objective-C only) (40 times) in preference to (C only) (4 times), (C++ and Objective-C++ only) (61 times) in preference to (6 times), but (C and C++ only) (5 times) and never all 4 languages, even when I think it is very likely some switch would be C only, C++ only or C and C++ only. And (C) is used just for Copyright ;) Jakub