From: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] aarch64,arm: Move branch-protection data to targets
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:43:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZ/+iIOyLERb6mOx@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5db1c93-637d-42ec-be47-ba15117aa7d5@foss.arm.com>
The 12/07/2023 13:13, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 03/11/2023 15:36, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch_handle_no_branch_protection): Copy.
> > (aarch_handle_standard_branch_protection): Copy.
> > (aarch_handle_pac_ret_protection): Copy.
> > (aarch_handle_pac_ret_leaf): Copy.
> > (aarch_handle_pac_ret_b_key): Copy.
> > (aarch_handle_bti_protection): Copy.
>
> I think all of the above functions that have been moved back from
> aarch-common should be renamed back to aarch64_..., unless they are directly
> referenced statically by code in aarch-common.c.
done.
> > +const struct aarch_branch_protect_type aarch_branch_protect_types[] = {
>
> can this be made static now? And maybe pass the structure as a parameter if
> that's not done already.
done in v4.
> It would be nice if, when we raise an error, we could print out the list of
> valid options (and modifiers), much like we do on Arm for -march/-mcpu.
>
> eg.
> $ gcc -mcpu=crotex-a8
> cc1: error: unrecognised -mcpu target: crotex-a8
> cc1: note: valid arguments are: arm8 arm810 strongarm strongarm110 fa526
> [...rest of list]; did you mean ‘cortex-a8’?
i implemented this with candidates_list_and_hint but it does
not work very well if the typo is in a subtype, so i think
this should be done in a separate patch if at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-11 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 15:36 [PATCH v2 0/7] aarch64 GCS preliminary patches Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] aarch64: Use br instead of ret for eh_return Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-13 0:27 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-11-13 11:18 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-26 12:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] aarch64: Do not force a stack frame for EH returns Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-26 12:12 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] aarch64: Add eh_return compile tests Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-26 14:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-27 10:04 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-27 15:57 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2023-12-02 19:23 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] aarch64: Disable branch-protection for pcs tests Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] aarch64,arm: Remove accepted_branch_protection_string Szabolcs Nagy
2023-11-26 14:50 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] aarch64,arm: Fix branch-protection= parsing Szabolcs Nagy
2023-12-07 13:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-11-03 15:36 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] aarch64,arm: Move branch-protection data to targets Szabolcs Nagy
2023-12-07 13:13 ` Richard Earnshaw
2024-01-11 14:43 ` Szabolcs Nagy [this message]
2024-01-11 14:49 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZ/+iIOyLERb6mOx@arm.com \
--to=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).