public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] asan: Don't fold some strlens with -fsanitize=address [PR110676]
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:23:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcIInrbI0w2ZW2HI@tucnak> (raw)

Hi!

The UB on the following testcase isn't diagnosed by -fsanitize=address,
because we see that the array has a single element and optimize the
strlen to 0.  I think it is fine to assume e.g. for range purposes the
lower bound for the strlen as long as we don't try to optimize
strlen (str)
where we know that it returns [26, 42] to
26 + strlen (str + 26), but for the upper bound we really want to punt
on optimizing that for -fsanitize=address to read all the bytes of the
string and diagnose if we run to object end etc.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2024-02-06  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR sanitizer/110676
	* gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_builtin_strlen): For -fsanitize=address
	reset maxlen to sizetype maximum.

	* gcc.dg/asan/pr110676.c: New test.

--- gcc/gimple-fold.cc.jj	2024-01-31 12:24:51.714239628 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.cc	2024-02-05 21:38:03.829964904 +0100
@@ -4019,6 +4019,11 @@ gimple_fold_builtin_strlen (gimple_stmt_
       maxlen = wi::to_wide (max_object_size (), prec) - 2;
     }
 
+  /* For -fsanitize=address, don't optimize the upper bound of the
+     length to be able to diagnose UB on non-zero terminated arrays.  */
+  if (sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_ADDRESS))
+    maxlen = wi::max_value (TYPE_PRECISION (sizetype), UNSIGNED);
+
   if (minlen == maxlen)
     {
       /* Fold the strlen call to a constant.  */
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr110676.c.jj	2024-02-05 21:42:43.657104536 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/pr110676.c	2024-02-05 21:42:39.091167524 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* PR sanitizer/110676 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */
+/* { dg-shouldfail "asan" } */
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  char s[1] = "A";
+  return __builtin_strlen (s);
+}
+
+/* { dg-output "ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address.*(\n|\r\n|\r)" } */
+/* { dg-output "READ of size.*" } */

	Jakub


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06 10:23 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2024-02-06 11:44 ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZcIInrbI0w2ZW2HI@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).