From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A9583858C31 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:30:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4A9583858C31 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4A9583858C31 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709109024; cv=none; b=HuhtRsk/rKLZBYI+xp1yFPZ7T00bGMDV/z5dXydgOI/FMd1tFLNhE0yFArAwNCffdxMi6K1lLCJVUsu30MVz72kOjJJcPgFnzMf7799ZrY20DxHpF4gbt0bBBncm68EIF9xouATdOj9qRHIwF36NRropug+Gm1ZsufV1Hmlb8qs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709109024; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O1K3DeJ/lgE8ofMDil59bkaY7+2pjAb0w4ufdtDJaMo=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=kIFbgbrNEAleyu58tV9rrjwS5xo215+OoUd42OC1dj2ZJQ0yPfDQAHt4MR7OTBCHJugXPqyOs0bI2236XCf8KzoHyhjTWkTSaQBgh9UDT+RHNoi6HckXi2FKLbVIxgHX7/2P8dRAtv1wUPgu73EyGHEukyeVGoTDBG6ZqM/5OQQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709109021; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=DFO9ATKb/oRBFvmsdRTHGCgChfJYqq9Bhvl5IN6ka/Y=; b=CsM3e3sacq8pSez2tXgthpCLHT86oHrHIgyO8WpsPjHfvpp0FeOzclT4ut6nXMNL45T/fD 3OyOPnrps4tugtm4nTUEvxlXdvVczP/Et1ADp0dYuwjueht0D90jiuhC8TrPLidYtP4RZY QpiRPgLTCiHfBbHyN9fMF6xqnvto+3o= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-194-6kC0pd18M-iBEjlsnbeoig-1; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:30:18 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 6kC0pd18M-iBEjlsnbeoig-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 244F787DC01; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C559D492BE2; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 08:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 41S8UF632997595 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:30:15 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 41S8UEm92997594; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:30:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 09:30:13 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Biener Cc: Richard Sandiford , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gimple-fold: Use bitwise vector types rather than barely supported huge integral types in memcpy etc. folding [PR113988] Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <5rn5rn2p-r4qr-n8s0-1577-36q4645or643@fhfr.qr> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5rn5rn2p-r4qr-n8s0-1577-36q4645or643@fhfr.qr> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 09:27:10AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > I guess the int_mode_for_size (ilen * BITS_PER_UNIT, 0).exists (&imode) > could then be removed in stage1? Yes, that's the plan. I'll make a note in my stage1 todo list. Jakub