From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45F0E3858D34 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 20:33:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 45F0E3858D34 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 45F0E3858D34 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709757186; cv=none; b=bVjU9yhHJLj15eBvZkTGS0RXgBpjyS6GYKdQik0Uyt5SZyMcsRQ2yqk8YWiuCplwLUoImb5oO4HQGUXCaUcQ+vS9rF2yN4GEH6JheJfC6940xgH/vs4D0uYokbrY0R6T3c+LxUaqcM1Lto/gA5roFp5tszjKneqs3KN3HU7bVa4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709757186; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uwEiJAMUGwTaEMfzmcg2s63yb+vGgbJcpB9CAb4x1AE=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=O2Pc/a/1fxWwn6yO5gCk81p4Wm3Bf1fc9O6Rmfcz0pkLoWbRAQ5qwiBUASvXI8xOOM3BdIO8wpDGmf0putFasNIecQ0mU5N89ZnLspAnSiolPGU7axN/BGOTD5lOUl8FuuGmYZI69wZu9p5qjy2FtXfN2dyHXyVnSY82MgiHWe8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709757184; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=xWNkdJ1HNdWjaSnXhJ6MBy5L3bfX3lQK9iAHVrfGYCk=; b=PM32z/J4qULh+b8/PyTo82xQv/lFWAQ2iFDrUMu0nlkXJ/6H6FQXlusB+t7PheqA4tmyCu oM7tseyCAeRTY5iNZfWQhqyVPLXskOktSdXZ0+R+JIqgKPSq7L/Wx8U59V6r7CwhHbT/Ce t9Saksustva4G72TDlwJ/HST4X85YiY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-536-o_zEZHTmPk6uNZPpYvYw_g-1; Wed, 06 Mar 2024 15:32:59 -0500 X-MC-Unique: o_zEZHTmPk6uNZPpYvYw_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C919C185A781; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 20:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.45.226.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F4417AA7; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 20:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 426KWu1r4123135 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:32:56 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 426KWu9t4123134; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:32:56 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 21:32:56 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Matthew Malcomson , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joseph Myers , Nick Clifton , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Kyrylo Tkachov Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix c23 0-named-args caller-side stdarg Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:28:21PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Mar 1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" wrote: > > > On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> Thanks for the review. > > > For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I > > don't think we need this now. > > ACK. I see the c2x-stdarg-4.c test is now passing in our arm-eabi > gcc-13 tree. Thank you all. > > Alas, the same nightly build showed a new riscv fail in c23-stdarg-6.c, > that also got backported to gcc-13. Presumably it's failing in the > trunk as well, both riscv32-elf and riscv64-elf. That is PR114175 I guess. The test just makes it clear what has been broken already in GCC 13 there. Jakub