public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: constexpr error with fn redecl in local scope [PR111132]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:43:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg701YvoQAuhCw_I@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a062363f-c6a5-4b1e-90d9-e189733c4478@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:14:46PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/2/24 13:52, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/13?
> > 
> > -- >8 --
> > We evaluate constexpr functions on the original, pre-genericization bodies.
> > That means that the function body we're evaluating will not have gone
> > through cp_genericize_r's "Map block scope extern declarations to visible
> > declarations with the same name and type in outer scopes if any".  Here:
> > 
> >    constexpr bool bar() { return true; } // #1
> >    constexpr bool foo() {
> >      constexpr bool bar(void); // #2
> >      return bar();
> >    }
> > 
> > it means that we:
> > 1) register_constexpr_fundef (#1)
> > 2) cp_genericize (#1)
> >     nothing interesting happens
> > 3) register_constexpr_fundef (foo)
> >     does copy_fn, so we have two copies of the BIND_EXPR
> > 4) cp_genericize (foo)
> >     this remaps #2 to #1, but only on one copy of the BIND_EXPR
> > 5) retrieve_constexpr_fundef (foo)
> >     we find it, no problem
> > 6) retrieve_constexpr_fundef (#2)
> >     and here #2 isn't found in constexpr_fundef_table, because
> >     we're working on the BIND_EXPR copy where #2 wasn't mapped to #1
> >     so we fail.  We've only registered #1.
> > 
> > It should work to use DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS (which used to be
> > extern_decl_map).  We evaluate constexpr functions on pre-cp_fold
> > bodies to avoid diagnostic problems, but the remapping I'm proposing
> > should not interfere with diagnostics.
> > 
> > This is not a problem for a global scope redeclaration; there we go
> > through duplicate_decls which keeps the DECL_UID:
> >    DECL_UID (olddecl) = olddecl_uid;
> > and DECL_UID is what constexpr_fundef_hasher::hash uses.
> > 
> > 	PR c++/111132
> > 
> > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > 
> > 	* constexpr.cc (get_function_named_in_call): If there's
> > 	a DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS, use it.
> 
> Perhaps this function should use cp_get_fndecl_from_callee, and this change
> should be made there instead?

It doesn't seem that get_function_named_in_call can use cp_get_fndecl_from_callee,
(or be replaced with cp_get_callee_fndecl_nofold).  We can get e.g. a CALL_EXPR
whose CALL_EXPR_FN is a TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR, and get_function_named_in_call
returns the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR whereas cp_get_fndecl_from_callee would return
null:

  if (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL)
    return fn;
  tree type = TREE_TYPE (fn);
  if (type == NULL_TREE || !INDIRECT_TYPE_P (type))
    return NULL_TREE;
    
Marek


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-02 17:52 Marek Polacek
2024-04-03 17:14 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-04 18:43   ` Marek Polacek [this message]
2024-04-04 21:28     ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-04 23:15       ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
2024-04-05  3:56         ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zg701YvoQAuhCw_I@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).