From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tree-optimization/114052 - niter analysis from undefined behavior
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhBVa1aNg74HGArz@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240405131334.85979139F1@imap2.dmz-prg2.suse.org>
> + /* When there's a call that might not return the last iteration
> + is possibly partial. This matches what we check in invariant
> + motion.
> + ??? For the call argument evaluation it would be still OK. */
> + if (!may_have_exited
> + && is_gimple_call (stmt)
> + && gimple_has_side_effects (stmt))
> + may_have_exited = true;
I think you are missing here non-call EH, volatile asms and traps.
We have stmt_may_terminate_function_p which tests there.
Honza
> +
> + infer_loop_bounds_from_array (loop, stmt,
> + reliable && !may_have_exited);
>
> - if (reliable)
> + if (reliable && !may_have_exited)
> {
> infer_loop_bounds_from_signedness (loop, stmt);
> infer_loop_bounds_from_pointer_arith (loop, stmt);
> }
> }
> -
> }
> }
>
> @@ -4832,7 +4855,7 @@ estimate_numbers_of_iterations (class loop *loop)
> diagnose those loops with -Waggressive-loop-optimizations. */
> number_of_latch_executions (loop);
>
> - basic_block *body = get_loop_body (loop);
> + basic_block *body = get_loop_body_in_rpo (cfun, loop);
> auto_vec<edge> exits = get_loop_exit_edges (loop, body);
> likely_exit = single_likely_exit (loop, exits);
> FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (exits, i, ex)
> --
> 2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 13:13 Richard Biener
2024-04-05 19:47 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2024-04-08 11:31 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-08 11:48 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-05 13:38 Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZhBVa1aNg74HGArz@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).