From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtlanal: Fix set_noop_p for volatile loads or stores [PR114768]
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:24:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiIOA962zzOBoe87@tucnak> (raw)
Hi!
On the following testcase, combine propagates the mem/v load into mem store
with the same address and then removes it, because noop_move_p says it is a
no-op move. If it was the other way around, i.e. mem/v store and mem load,
or both would be mem/v, it would be kept.
The problem is that rtx_equal_p never checks any kind of flags on the rtxes
(and I think it would be quite dangerous to change it at this point), and
set_noop_p checks side_effects_p on just one of the operands, not both.
In the MEM <- MEM set, it only checks it on the destination, in
store to ZERO_EXTRACT only checks it on the source.
The following patch adds the missing side_effects_p checks.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2024-04-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/114768
* rtlanal.cc (set_noop_p): Don't return true for MEM <- MEM
sets if src has side-effects or for stores into ZERO_EXTRACT
if ZERO_EXTRACT operand has side-effects.
* gcc.dg/pr114768.c: New test.
--- gcc/rtlanal.cc.jj 2024-02-24 12:45:28.674249100 +0100
+++ gcc/rtlanal.cc 2024-04-18 15:09:55.199499083 +0200
@@ -1637,12 +1637,15 @@ set_noop_p (const_rtx set)
return true;
if (MEM_P (dst) && MEM_P (src))
- return rtx_equal_p (dst, src) && !side_effects_p (dst);
+ return (rtx_equal_p (dst, src)
+ && !side_effects_p (dst)
+ && !side_effects_p (src));
if (GET_CODE (dst) == ZERO_EXTRACT)
- return rtx_equal_p (XEXP (dst, 0), src)
- && !BITS_BIG_ENDIAN && XEXP (dst, 2) == const0_rtx
- && !side_effects_p (src);
+ return (rtx_equal_p (XEXP (dst, 0), src)
+ && !BITS_BIG_ENDIAN && XEXP (dst, 2) == const0_rtx
+ && !side_effects_p (src)
+ && !side_effects_p (XEXP (dst, 0)));
if (GET_CODE (dst) == STRICT_LOW_PART)
dst = XEXP (dst, 0);
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr114768.c.jj 2024-04-18 15:37:49.139433678 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr114768.c 2024-04-18 15:43:30.389730365 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* PR rtl-optimization/114768 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-final" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "\\\(mem/v:" "final" { target { ! { nvptx*-*-* } } } } } */
+
+void
+foo (int *p)
+{
+ *p = *(volatile int *) p;
+}
Jakub
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 6:24 Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2024-04-19 6:33 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-19 10:23 ` Thomas Schwinge
2024-04-19 10:30 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-19 10:39 ` Enable 'gcc.dg/pr114768.c' for nvptx target [PR114768] (was: [PATCH] rtlanal: Fix set_noop_p for volatile loads or stores [PR114768]) Thomas Schwinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiIOA962zzOBoe87@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).