From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 106623882062 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:40:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 106623882062 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 106623882062 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718217654; cv=none; b=qzUJcqOOFqqKAi7rv7yIo1mcB23aIL96V5ZvtDiVHf2yr49e1NBCrRW8EGtY+7sTFR7PVHmR54wCVe2p71FpNx4z2qwW2GptaPRXiouDnHMJIoVwXYV3giXdo3lqxuA31UjsrQbqL17ndN+ddxjhDKYL1D/EVISoo7OqQV6+UlA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718217654; c=relaxed/simple; bh=310D4gUsrtw6tsgNx+lPy7GSH+4vc1qnNgGasCpl7G4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=f7fbduSrm29C0TNI7BOWxJfAJ6Z+B3+kd8OWGVTdoQv7+tbmpMNCxkVyaGhKoW3W3/nUerfU6d8HH1FRDQEl0L2MC8/ztIBjeNrGYGKG2PGEii3DZkQjE7k0An7T9ApJdZ6I8ueU0CjFtHXGTEKxuXTrOywfLaxt8X31cMwFgYw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718217652; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Eo5IA/8gDNwgRp24Fa2190PkEAUHYW9S9a4TgBEMkhs=; b=PUqcBSql07aa2PVhscdmEBDxwj1HaubwJaEreakrRSi8jY1m9rXgs2JK8FMm+xXriQf9db 5AcewFw5brl8TsSxMUsskui19OJZrQLk9fJh95nHGL3hJIlPYXLdP7iaNTdMU9ztkyzbNd B4v27Uu1a463/w8IktgDjkvQEbaQKjE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-571-lXzSDy9iMDyQxU0GVOuykw-1; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:40:46 -0400 X-MC-Unique: lXzSDy9iMDyQxU0GVOuykw-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562DB19560BD; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.128]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51C31956050; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:40:41 +0100 From: Jonathan Wakely To: Rene Rebe Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de, frank.scheiner@web.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove ia64*-*-linux from the list of obsolete targets Message-ID: References: <3DAB006A-ACE2-4BEC-AA01-87625DBEE259@exactcode.de> <20240612.123343.1340522057045758230.rene@exactcode.de> <20240612.124202.421166828453958303.rene@exactcode.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240612.124202.421166828453958303.rene@exactcode.de> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 12/06/24 12:42 +0200, Rene Rebe wrote: >The following un-deprecates ia64*-*-linux for GCC 15. Since we plan to >support this for some years to come. > >gcc/ > * config.gcc: Only exlicitly list ia64*-*-(hpux|vms|elf) in the > list of obsoleted targets. > >contrib/ > * config-list.mk (LIST): no --enable-obsolete for ia64*-*-linux. >--- > contrib/config-list.mk | 4 ++-- > gcc/config.gcc | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/contrib/config-list.mk b/contrib/config-list.mk >index f282cd95c8d..b99573b1f5b 100644 >--- a/contrib/config-list.mk >+++ b/contrib/config-list.mk >@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ LIST = \ > i686-pc-linux-gnu i686-pc-msdosdjgpp i686-lynxos i686-nto-qnx \ > i686-rtems i686-solaris2.11 i686-wrs-vxworks \ > i686-wrs-vxworksae \ >- i686-cygwinOPT-enable-threads=yes i686-mingw32crt ia64-elfOPT-enable-obsolete \ >- ia64-linuxOPT-enable-obsolete ia64-hpuxOPT-enable-obsolete \ >+ i686-cygwinOPT-enable-threads=yes i686-mingw32crt linux-ia64 \ Shouldn't this be ia64-linux? And why reorder the entries? I would expect the change to be simply s/ia64-linuxOPT-enable-obsolete/ia64-linux/ >+ ia64-elfOPT-enable-obsolete ia64-hpuxOPT-enable-obsolete > ia64-hp-vmsOPT-enable-obsolete iq2000-elf lm32-elf \ > lm32-rtems lm32-uclinux \ > loongarch64-linux-gnuf64 loongarch64-linux-gnuf32 loongarch64-linux-gnusf \ >diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc >index a37113bd00a..6d6ca6da7a0 100644 >--- a/gcc/config.gcc >+++ b/gcc/config.gcc >@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ esac > > # Obsolete configurations. > case ${target} in >- ia64*-*-* \ >+ ia64*-*-hpux* | ia64*-*-*vms* | ia64*-*-elf* \ > | nios2*-*-* \ > ) > if test "x$enable_obsolete" != xyes; then >-- >2.45.0 > > >-- > René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin > https://exactcode.com | https://t2sde.org | https://rene.rebe.de