From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152533858D39 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:10:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 152533858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 152533858D39 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1725916243; cv=none; b=N0MbvcLB1CmY0Zl75HwaYYiyf0P+iwZ9up1MFGppF9KzqyL6edrRdx5N9A/ND62T4Y/zDLjn62RmNoKxsoz9RfqI2yaX/ed5nUZhzUoRbZaUxKC3/e+eAyptjpODJR3sd8s1L5SVpsxxh54O08FRj5i5TD6S7JKPLxefehzuzR8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1725916243; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZCkntXVfUk5LQEguviQyEkGL/iVakftWaDSsWB50aiY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=aw+3WRid/ODnEhylgwfvUbshPAInYM2aBCsJBZKFiuO5oG7uHuE1hUSpIS1O132mCJd/2ic/PJTtf5hI0Rgypd72wFSjfTquGDUZQ6RdPc3qUIbDFLRhcdIXlSvHZYFWGCjW9spinyEIUivC3Lx5294ZIR99+L84f8e86LOPLa4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1725916241; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=INHKWy8Qef9Wai4NqoApbOSw0KTArAaxoFRqFhOr7QY=; b=NtwL0ky9C0ret/S5c6iMmnVDapmSqtKJDyo3O5zGM2ysKhWqHKk2OkAbnNArsOOtn4WJtC T0c03BOyRd2/OU3/Ge8LEnbYM97NqSyu5UHrFEZsECGfatthawL3s6IEa7Hr4PtsjLXfdc p40n1ZaerMiP5YpFq40aylv9HDtT9+0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-482-glE602ZmNjCdKL38VQAj1A-1; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 17:10:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: glE602ZmNjCdKL38VQAj1A-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE9BE1955F40; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.45.224.29]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A7F19560AA; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 489LAVtA129392 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:10:31 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 489LAVAC129391; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:10:31 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 23:10:31 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Sandra Loosemore Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, tburnus@baylibre.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] OpenMP: Reject other properties with kind(any) Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20240720204231.2229891-1-sloosemore@baylibre.com> <20240720204231.2229891-9-sloosemore@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 02:55:25PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 9/9/24 05:01, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > I think also testing the device={kind(any,any)} and device={kind("any",any)} > > and device={kind(any,"any"))} would be useful. > > Hmmm, it looks like GCC does not presently check for the restriction > > "Each trait-property may only be specified once in a trait selector other > than those in the construct selector set." Seems that restriction is new in 5.1 (which is why it hasn't been checked in the original code). Jakub