From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch (mail-40131.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.131]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9456F3858D38 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 11:08:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 9456F3858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=protonmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=protonmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 9456F3858D38 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=185.70.40.131 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701860923; cv=none; b=uTGI4VtQiCQCBEm0n7++QsuC+t0zcO/pmUPmJ/x9Z9lpajHFbPJVviil00GJbnEJ1qYnSioAlWwsP2bdvql0jj8rBPzCLnecMJprakJZlNOxqigZw3N98S+GnCbV+yPGKu/AhIhfu9pJZo6qvR+dWpJkywqW3WIQkexgUish2qQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701860923; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gCPlbpxjsyem6XRKnfWo415BXdx0H2d5yNDvFWx5sis=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=SZoamIigbXUXZBe9rfv7blO7s0IaNoWx3d5KOQgXzBsVtrcVaLc4Tl/IKFC6A8s0zsOrbSX9IoHXDe9dfSOrkzkVSoKZDPH78rqI7rjf5I0iP74R+qcOzM5hYE7dpkE6jHXsS7lTJpOZ/Hqj7jWOjzgN8KFsvwyCcfuMxg8bf5Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1701860912; x=1702120112; bh=gCPlbpxjsyem6XRKnfWo415BXdx0H2d5yNDvFWx5sis=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=sthIYooyqJrkYZ2gWuaDkZUPBkMrkqY/0p2b4PXNhWSsZk8O0wxhXKDxBU+/mwvRX hPfGexNTJHynD0udFStAOWKul6rYQc5jCFi1UVQoSLRGE4ImP47cyrVko0B8ckBbeb Vi7g/ScG5SCN7V9Q4e16H6IRLd81Lq+HUs4fz0Z/wsPk8Cxa9wd4lEXHAyVBaLD1Ge ot6iYs4id8A9XLlCqziaDhfV51HGShUc9Izn3XTQWgO74qINyURKrTrVZofvwov+9O U+f3B5McGp3pJ/G1GXEv/jLAWP8vc7KtMsQAmEpMA+dJcUoXGo3CErviNGNJp4+2d1 HgHOMyGTZGhYA== Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 11:08:16 +0000 To: waffl3x From: waffl3x Cc: Jason Merrill , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/1] c++: Initial support for P0847R7 (Deducing This) [PR102609] Message-ID: <_RTpVFY8Y2g5V5bj3c0ZHLYUozF4V_IBRfAIKsiE_t0_EuE7-M-s2up_gUGHaIrNDgmYe5F6J05_r601pV4bjV4TsHbwrAyjjCKtVc-dHUA=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <_e1O52EjoN_BFiH31iHE-0eYegNJhoOdDN2O0mduqtMmt7qTGpRWgduxNppnO1si01rORJ470oWcoM-_lk1ICFo9lhe_ylBKQsJ791qMm_k=@protonmail.com> <1b3b0259-5ce4-4193-a36d-60f09e1c7c92@redhat.com> <575c0bbe-a3d6-4a54-b299-edff64df84b1@redhat.com> <59LofhYhxl7MLEuElXwZcESRB6MpjdG-iq-89B63siDRo5k0j-y6z-PVa6Y3iE1xE5LkJwpwTFi82bd0RZjB1yZbSJptFdPTBWfvOGj1W78=@protonmail.com> <61NBWPmN34lD25i-dND5emZReJ7UbgkAcSiy1eYvjwWO9ALSTArJ4NWvOqN5UDOvbmr_dTNdRFNBCkpuu5eL41dHdZfNcqH4UZru7JK2k50=@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 14591686:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Follow up to this, bootstrapped and tested with no regressions. On Wednesday, December 6th, 2023 at 12:33 AM, waffl3x wrote: >=20 >=20 > Here is the next version, it feels very close to finished. As before, I > haven't ran a bootstrap or the full testsuite yet but I did run the > explicit-obj tests which completed as expected. >=20 > There's a few test cases that still need to be written but more tests > can always be added. The behavior added by CWG2789 works in at least > one case, but I have not added tests for it yet. The test cases for > dependent lambda expressions need to be fleshed out more, but a few > temporary ones are included to demonstrate that they do work and that > the crash is fixed. Explicit object conversion functions work, but I > need to add fleshed out tests for them, explicit-obj-basic5.C has that > test. >=20 > I'll start the tests now and report back if anything fails, I'm > confident everything will be fine though. >=20 > Alex