From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60420 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2017 15:21:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 59325 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jun 2017 15:21:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:21:43 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E6F81127; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:21:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com C7E6F81127 Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=law@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com C7E6F81127 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-117-103.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.117.103]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3CE808C7; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [ping * 2] PR78736: New C warning -Wenum-conversion To: Joseph Myers Cc: Prathamesh Kulkarni , gcc Patches , Marek Polacek References: From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg02397.txt.bz2 On 06/29/2017 05:01 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Jeff Law wrote: > >> On 05/23/2017 07:54 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I would like to ping this patch for review: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00775.html >> So was there any kind of resolution on the case in libcomp where we had >> an assignment between two essentially equivalent, but distinct enums? > > I don't know. I approved this patch on the 12th subject to one > correction, but see it hasn't yet been committed. OK. I missed that (not uncommon given the depth of the queue of things I'm working through). I'll trust that Prathamesh will commit after addressing the one issue you raised. THanks, jeff