From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] c++: improve "NTTP argument considered unused" fix [PR53164, PR105848]
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 17:36:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a22ddfe6-7f14-ead4-6787-a1d7db03e56a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a04306f-faa9-5dd8-c850-05aa4a21d36e@idea>
On 3/27/23 09:30, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>> r13-995-g733a792a2b2e16 worked around the problem of FUNCTION_DECL
>> template arguments not always getting marked as odr-used by redundantly
>> calling mark_used on the substituted ADDR_EXPR callee of a CALL_EXPR.
>> This is just a narrow workaround however, since using a FUNCTION_DECL as
>> a template argument alone should constitutes an odr-use; we shouldn't
>> need to subsequently e.g. call the function or take its address.
Agreed. But why didn't we already wrap it in an ADDR_EXPR? Even for
reference tparms convert_nontype_argument should do that.
>> This patch fixes this in a more general way at template specialization
>> time by walking the template arguments of the specialization and calling
>> mark_used on all entities used within. As before, the call to mark_used
>> as it worst a no-op, but it compensates for the situation where we end up
>> forming a specialization from a template context in which mark_used is
>> inhibited. Another approach would be to call mark_used whenever we
>> substitute a TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX, but that would result in many more
>> redundant calls to mark_used compared to this approach.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
>> trunk?
>>
>> PR c++/53164
>> PR c++/105848
>>
>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * pt.cc (instantiate_class_template): Call
>> mark_template_arguments_used.
>> (tsubst_copy_and_build) <case CALL_EXPR>: Revert r13-995 change.
>> (mark_template_arguments_used): Define.
>> (instantiate_template): Call mark_template_arguments_used.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C: New test.
>> * g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C: New test.
>> ---
>> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 51 ++++++++++++++++--------
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C | 25 ++++++++++++
>> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C | 14 +++++++
>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> index 7e4a8de0c8b..9b3cc33331c 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static tree make_argument_pack (tree);
>> static tree enclosing_instantiation_of (tree tctx);
>> static void instantiate_body (tree pattern, tree args, tree d, bool nested);
>> static tree maybe_dependent_member_ref (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
>> +static void mark_template_arguments_used (tree);
>>
>> /* Make the current scope suitable for access checking when we are
>> processing T. T can be FUNCTION_DECL for instantiated function
>> @@ -12142,6 +12143,9 @@ instantiate_class_template (tree type)
>> cp_unevaluated_operand = 0;
>> c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = 0;
>> }
>> +
>> + mark_template_arguments_used (INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_ARGS (args));
>> +
>> /* Use #pragma pack from the template context. */
>> saved_maximum_field_alignment = maximum_field_alignment;
>> maximum_field_alignment = TYPE_PRECISION (pattern);
>> @@ -21173,22 +21177,10 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t,
>> }
>>
>> /* Remember that there was a reference to this entity. */
>> - if (function != NULL_TREE)
>> - {
>> - tree inner = function;
>> - if (TREE_CODE (inner) == ADDR_EXPR
>> - && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (inner, 0)) == FUNCTION_DECL)
>> - /* We should already have called mark_used when taking the
>> - address of this function, but do so again anyway to make
>> - sure it's odr-used: at worst this is a no-op, but if we
>> - obtained this FUNCTION_DECL as part of ahead-of-time overload
>> - resolution then that call to mark_used wouldn't have marked it
>> - odr-used yet (53164). */
>> - inner = TREE_OPERAND (inner, 0);
>> - if (DECL_P (inner)
>> - && !mark_used (inner, complain) && !(complain & tf_error))
>> - RETURN (error_mark_node);
>> - }
>> + if (function != NULL_TREE
>> + && DECL_P (function)
>> + && !mark_used (function, complain) && !(complain & tf_error))
>> + RETURN (error_mark_node);
>>
>> if (!maybe_fold_fn_template_args (function, complain))
>> return error_mark_node;
>> @@ -21883,6 +21875,31 @@ check_instantiated_args (tree tmpl, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain)
>> return result;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Call mark_used on each entity within the template arguments ARGS of some
>> + template specialization, to ensure that each such entity is considered
>> + odr-used regardless of whether the specialization was first formed in a
>> + template context.
>> +
>> + This function assumes push_to_top_level has been called beforehand, and
>> + that processing_template_decl has been set iff the template arguments
>> + are dependent. */
>> +
>> +static void
>> +mark_template_arguments_used (tree args)
>> +{
>> + gcc_checking_assert (TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) == 1);
>> +
>> + if (processing_template_decl)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + auto mark_used_r = [](tree *tp, int *, void *) {
>> + if (DECL_P (*tp))
>> + mark_used (*tp, tf_none);
>> + return NULL_TREE;
>> + };
>> + cp_walk_tree_without_duplicates (&args, mark_used_r, nullptr);
>
> Here's v2 which optimizes this function by not walking if
> !PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (since in that case the innermost arguments have
> already been walked when instantiating the context), and walking only
> non-type arguments:
>
> -- >8
>
> Subject: [PATCH] c++: improve "NTTP argument considered unused" fix [PR53164,
> PR105848]
>
> PR c++/53164
> PR c++/105848
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * pt.cc (instantiate_class_template): Call
> mark_template_arguments_used.
> (tsubst_copy_and_build) <case CALL_EXPR>: Revert r13-995 change.
> (mark_template_arguments_used): Define.
> (instantiate_template): Call mark_template_arguments_used.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 57 +++++++++++++++++-------
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C | 25 +++++++++++
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C | 14 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index 3bb98ebeac1..a87366bb616 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -220,6 +220,7 @@ static tree make_argument_pack (tree);
> static tree enclosing_instantiation_of (tree tctx);
> static void instantiate_body (tree pattern, tree args, tree d, bool nested);
> static tree maybe_dependent_member_ref (tree, tree, tsubst_flags_t, tree);
> +static void mark_template_arguments_used (tree, tree);
>
> /* Make the current scope suitable for access checking when we are
> processing T. T can be FUNCTION_DECL for instantiated function
> @@ -12152,6 +12153,9 @@ instantiate_class_template (tree type)
> cp_unevaluated_operand = 0;
> c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = 0;
> }
> +
> + mark_template_arguments_used (templ, CLASSTYPE_TI_ARGS (type));
> +
> /* Use #pragma pack from the template context. */
> saved_maximum_field_alignment = maximum_field_alignment;
> maximum_field_alignment = TYPE_PRECISION (pattern);
> @@ -21192,22 +21196,10 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t,
> }
>
> /* Remember that there was a reference to this entity. */
> - if (function != NULL_TREE)
> - {
> - tree inner = function;
> - if (TREE_CODE (inner) == ADDR_EXPR
> - && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (inner, 0)) == FUNCTION_DECL)
> - /* We should already have called mark_used when taking the
> - address of this function, but do so again anyway to make
> - sure it's odr-used: at worst this is a no-op, but if we
> - obtained this FUNCTION_DECL as part of ahead-of-time overload
> - resolution then that call to mark_used wouldn't have marked it
> - odr-used yet (53164). */
> - inner = TREE_OPERAND (inner, 0);
> - if (DECL_P (inner)
> - && !mark_used (inner, complain) && !(complain & tf_error))
> - RETURN (error_mark_node);
> - }
> + if (function != NULL_TREE
> + && DECL_P (function)
> + && !mark_used (function, complain) && !(complain & tf_error))
> + RETURN (error_mark_node);
>
> if (!maybe_fold_fn_template_args (function, complain))
> return error_mark_node;
> @@ -21902,6 +21894,37 @@ check_instantiated_args (tree tmpl, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> return result;
> }
>
> +/* Call mark_used on each entity within the non-type template arguments in
> + ARGS for a specialization of TMPL, to ensure that each such entity is
> + considered odr-used regardless of whether the specialization was first
> + formed in a template context.
> +
> + This function assumes push_to_top_level has been called beforehand, and
> + that processing_template_decl is set iff the template arguments are
> + dependent. */
> +
> +static void
> +mark_template_arguments_used (tree tmpl, tree args)
> +{
> + /* It suffices to do this only when fully specializing a primary template. */
> + if (processing_template_decl || !PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (tmpl))
> + return;
> +
> + /* We already marked outer arguments when specializing the context. */
> + args = INNERMOST_TEMPLATE_ARGS (args);
> +
> + for (tree arg : tree_vec_range (args))
> + if (!TYPE_P (arg))
> + {
> + auto mark_used_r = [](tree *tp, int *, void *) {
> + if (DECL_P (*tp))
> + mark_used (*tp, tf_none);
> + return NULL_TREE;
> + };
> + cp_walk_tree_without_duplicates (&args, mark_used_r, nullptr);
Do we really need to walk into the args?
> + }
> +}
> +
> /* We're out of SFINAE context now, so generate diagnostics for the access
> errors we saw earlier when instantiating D from TMPL and ARGS. */
>
> @@ -22031,6 +22054,8 @@ instantiate_template (tree tmpl, tree orig_args, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> push_nested_class (ctx);
> }
>
> + mark_template_arguments_used (gen_tmpl, targ_ptr);
> +
> tree pattern = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (gen_tmpl);
>
> fndecl = NULL_TREE;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..7456be5d51f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr3a.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// PR c++/53164
> +// PR c++/105848
> +// A stricter version of fn-ptr3.C that verifies using f as a template
> +// argument alone constitutes an odr-use.
> +
> +template<class T>
> +void f(T) { T::fail; } // { dg-error "fail" }
> +
> +template<void (*P)(int)>
> +struct A {
> + static void wrap();
> +};
> +
> +template<void (&P)(char)>
> +void wrap();
> +
> +template<int>
> +void g() {
> + A<f>::wrap(); // { dg-message "required from here" }
> + wrap<f>(); // { dg-message "required from here" }
> +}
> +
> +int main() {
> + g<0>();
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..36551ec5d7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/fn-ptr4.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +
> +template<void (*P)()>
> +void wrap() {
> + P(); // OK, despite A::g not being accessible from here.
> +}
> +
> +struct A {
> + static void f() {
> + wrap<A::g>();
> + }
> +private:
> + static void g();
> +};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 21:18 Patrick Palka
2023-03-23 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] c++: duplicate "use of deleted fn" diagnostic [PR106880] Patrick Palka
2023-03-30 2:58 ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-23 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] c++: improve "NTTP argument considered unused" fix [PR53164, PR105848] Patrick Palka
2023-03-27 13:30 ` Patrick Palka
2023-03-29 21:36 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-03-30 18:53 ` Patrick Palka
2023-03-30 21:39 ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-31 15:25 ` Patrick Palka
2023-03-31 15:55 ` Patrick Palka
2023-03-31 17:28 ` Jason Merrill
2023-03-31 19:06 ` Patrick Palka
2023-04-01 3:50 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a22ddfe6-7f14-ead4-6787-a1d7db03e56a@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).