From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <josmyers@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Fix up setup_incoming_varargs [PR114175]
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:42:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3067eb2-dd26-2500-6d5c-2046e457650f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zfh4EvFIEYe+Ym5W@tucnak>
Hi Jakub,
on 2024/3/19 01:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The c23-stdarg-8.c test (as well as the new test below added to cover even
> more cases) FAIL on powerpc64le-linux and presumably other powerpc* targets
> as well.
> Like in the r14-9503-g218d174961 change on x86-64 we need to advance
> next_cum after the hidden return pointer argument even in case where
> there are no user arguments before ... in C23.
> The following patch does that.
>
> There is another TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P use later on:
> if (!TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P (TREE_TYPE (current_function_decl))
> && targetm.calls.must_pass_in_stack (arg))
> first_reg_offset += rs6000_arg_size (TYPE_MODE (arg.type), arg.type);
> but I believe it was added there in r13-3549-g4fe34cdc unnecessarily,
> when there is no hidden return pointer argument, arg.type is NULL and
> must_pass_in_stack_var_size as well as must_pass_in_stack_var_size_or_pad
> return false in that case, and for the TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P
> case with hidden return pointer argument that argument should have pointer
> type and it is the first argument, so must_pass_in_stack shouldn't be true
> for it either.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64le-linux, bootstrap/regtest on
> powerpc64-linux running, ok for trunk?
Okay for trunk (I guess all testings should go well), thanks for taking
care of this!
FWIW, I also tested c23-stdarg-* test cases on aix with this patch, all
of them worked well.
BR,
Kewen
>
> 2024-03-18 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR target/114175
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.cc (setup_incoming_varargs): Only skip
> rs6000_function_arg_advance_1 for TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P functions
> if arg.type is NULL.
>
> * gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-9.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.cc.jj 2024-01-03 12:01:19.645532834 +0100
> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.cc 2024-03-18 11:36:02.376846802 +0100
> @@ -2253,7 +2253,8 @@ setup_incoming_varargs (cumulative_args_
>
> /* Skip the last named argument. */
> next_cum = *get_cumulative_args (cum);
> - if (!TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P (TREE_TYPE (current_function_decl)))
> + if (!TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P (TREE_TYPE (current_function_decl))
> + || arg.type != NULL_TREE)
> rs6000_function_arg_advance_1 (&next_cum, arg.mode, arg.type, arg.named,
> 0);
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-9.c.jj 2024-03-18 11:46:17.281200214 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c23-stdarg-9.c 2024-03-18 11:46:26.826065998 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
> +/* Test C23 variadic functions with no named parameters, or last named
> + parameter with a declaration not allowed in C17. Execution tests. */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c23 -pedantic-errors" } */
> +
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +
> +struct S { int a[1024]; };
> +
> +int
> +f1 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f2 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f3 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f4 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f5 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f6 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f7 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +f8 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + return r;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s1 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s2 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s3 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s4 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s5 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s6 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s7 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +s8 (...)
> +{
> + int r = 0;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + r += va_arg (ap, int);
> + va_end (ap);
> + struct S s = {};
> + s.a[0] = r;
> + return s;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +b1 (void)
> +{
> + return f8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8);
> +}
> +
> +int
> +b2 (void)
> +{
> + return s8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).a[0];
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> + if (f1 (1) != 1 || f2 (1, 2) != 3 || f3 (1, 2, 3) != 6
> + || f4 (1, 2, 3, 4) != 10 || f5 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) != 15
> + || f6 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) != 21 || f7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) != 28
> + || f8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) != 36)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> + if (s1 (1).a[0] != 1 || s2 (1, 2).a[0] != 3 || s3 (1, 2, 3).a[0] != 6
> + || s4 (1, 2, 3, 4).a[0] != 10 || s5 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).a[0] != 15
> + || s6 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).a[0] != 21
> + || s7 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).a[0] != 28
> + || s8 (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).a[0] != 36)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 17:21 Jakub Jelinek
2024-03-19 7:42 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3067eb2-dd26-2500-6d5c-2046e457650f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).