From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5519385802F for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:22:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C5519385802F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gerald@pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5215033E92; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:22:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (77.118.226.34.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.118.226.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8AD433E84; Fri, 27 Nov 2020 11:22:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 17:22:17 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "H.J. Lu" cc: GCC Patches , Richard Biener Subject: Re: [PATCH] INSTALL: Default to --enable-cet=auto In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20201127134211.1808714-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 16:22:25 -0000 On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote: > +@code{--enable-cet=auto} is default. CET is enabled on Linux/x86 if > +target binutils supports @code{Intel CET} instructions and disabled > +otherwise. In this case, the target libraries are configured to get > +additional @option{-fcf-protection} option. Does that refer to the Linux kernel or GNU/Linux? THe last sentence does not appear complete. What do you want to say? "...target libraries are built with @option{-fcf-protection}"? On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote: > OK for backport to GCC 10? Yes, once we have resolved the above. Gerald