* [C++ PATCH] missing set_class_binding call
@ 2017-09-01 18:12 Nathan Sidwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nathan Sidwell @ 2017-09-01 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 215 bytes --]
This patch adds a set_class_binding call that was missing from the
template class definition case.
Brief experimentation shows undetectable difference in performance.
Applied to trunk.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
[-- Attachment #2: bind.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 608 bytes --]
2017-09-01 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
* class.c (finish_struct): Call set_class_bindings for the
template case too.
Index: class.c
===================================================================
--- class.c (revision 251604)
+++ class.c (working copy)
@@ -7188,6 +7188,7 @@ finish_struct (tree t, tree attributes)
/* COMPLETE_TYPE_P is now true. */
finish_struct_methods (t);
+ set_class_bindings (t, TYPE_FIELDS (t));
/* We need to emit an error message if this type was used as a parameter
and it is an abstract type, even if it is a template. We construct
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-09-01 18:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-01 18:12 [C++ PATCH] missing set_class_binding call Nathan Sidwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).