From: chenxiaolong <chenxiaolong@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn, chenglulu@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] LoongArch: Modify the check type of the vector builtin function.
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 11:21:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4c867f0d6136f5f1f9e6bc83ee6aaa99ce75755.camel@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f4b78a06d9b677fa21964f652cc60a05cf161bb.camel@xry111.site>
在 2023-12-05二的 20:44 +0800,Xi Ruoyao写道:
> On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 17:21 +0800, chenxiaolong wrote:
> > According to your suggestion, the check of the built-in function
> > was modifiedin the simd_correctness_check.h file, and the types of
> > the actual parameters
> > of the built-in function were inconsistent with those of the formal
> > parameters.
> > The problems with the GCC regression test are as follows:
> >
> > ...
> > note: expected 'const void *' but argument is of type '__m128i'
> > error: incompatible type for argument 3 of 'ASSERTEQ_64'
> > ...
> >
> > The reason is that the types used in __m{128i,128,128d} are defined
> > in
> > the vector header file (lsxintrin.h or lasxintrin.h), and their
> > basic
> > types do not match the parameter types corresponding to the
> > functions.
>
> Ouch. I forgot that we are passing vectors themselves to
> ASSERTEQ_64,
> not the pointers.
>
> Now I come up with this:
>
> #include <cstdio>
> #include <cstring>
> #include <cstdlib>
>
> static inline void
> dump (const void *_ptr, int size, const char *name)
> {
> const char *ptr = (const char *)_ptr;
>
> printf("%s:", name);
>
> for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
> printf(" %02hhx", ptr[i]);
>
> putchar('\n');
> }
>
> template <class U, class V>
> static inline void
> assert_eq (const U &res, const V &ref, int line)
> {
> static_assert(sizeof (res) == sizeof (ref));
> if (!memcmp (&res, &ref, sizeof(ref)))
> return;
>
> dump (res, sizeof (res), "res");
> dump (ref, sizeof (ref), "ref");
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> float x[4] = {};
> int y[4] = {};
> assert_eq(x, y, __LINE__);
> }
>
> This is C++, not C. But IMO we can port the tests to C++ anyway.
>
Following your idea, I tried to change C into C++ code. The problem is
that the tests cases of LoongArch architecture are written in the style
of C language, and the code changed to C++ involves more problems and
is not easy to completely modify. So it's best to keep the C language
style.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-07 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 12:14 chenxiaolong
2023-12-04 12:31 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-12-04 12:38 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-12-05 9:21 ` chenxiaolong
2023-12-05 12:44 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-12-07 3:21 ` chenxiaolong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4c867f0d6136f5f1f9e6bc83ee6aaa99ce75755.camel@loongson.cn \
--to=chenxiaolong@loongson.cn \
--cc=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=i@xen0n.name \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).