public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>,
	Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,
	gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, fortran@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Pushing XFAILed test cases
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:25:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4fbe2f9-1068-4f31-05bb-bb987b6c31a6@netcologne.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18f90084-4d3a-f6f0-8a2a-d305ce152b0d@codesourcery.com>

On 16.07.21 20:22, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> So it seems to me rather surprising to take the position that we should 
> not be committing any new test cases that need to be XFAILed

It is what I was told in no uncertain terms some years ago, which
is where my current state of knowledge comes from.

So, I have added the gcc mailing list to this discussion, with a
general question.

Is it or is it not gcc policy to push a large number of test cases
that currently do not work and XFAIL them?

Regards

	Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-17  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16  3:46 [PATCH, Fortran] Bind(c): CFI_signed_char is not a Fortran character type Sandra Loosemore
2021-07-16  7:52 ` Thomas Koenig
2021-07-16 15:32   ` Pushing XFAILed test cases (was: [PATCH, Fortran] Bind(c): CFI_signed_char is not a Fortran character type) Thomas Schwinge
2021-07-16 17:26     ` Pushing XFAILed test cases Martin Sebor
2021-07-16 18:22     ` Sandra Loosemore
2021-07-17  7:25       ` Thomas Koenig [this message]
2021-07-21  9:20         ` Tobias Burnus
2021-07-22  8:03 ` [PATCH, Fortran] Bind(c): CFI_signed_char is not a Fortran character type Tobias Burnus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4fbe2f9-1068-4f31-05bb-bb987b6c31a6@netcologne.de \
    --to=tkoenig@netcologne.de \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sandra@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).