public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Preudhomme <thomas.preudhomme@foss.arm.com>
To: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com>
Cc: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, GCC/ARM, gcc-6-branch] Fix PR80082: LDRD erronously used for 64bit load on ARMv7-R
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a567d163-fe94-f10a-6c9c-379d5eb07b90@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJA7tRYXFPxw+356bUrxdPBP0nvZp_bPAmyGVU65eitbOhCZfw@mail.gmail.com>



On 06/04/17 14:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Thomas Preudhomme
> <thomas.preudhomme@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently GCC is happy to use LDRD to perform a 64bit load on ARMv7-R,
>> as shown by the testcase on this patch. However, LDRD is only atomic
>> when LPAE extensions is available, which they are not for ARMv7-R. This
>> commit solve the issue by introducing a new feature bit to distinguish
>> LPAE extensions instead of deducing it from div instruction
>> availability.
>
>
> Ok but with the testsuite fix that I just approved,  please also fix
> in gcc-5 branch.

The backport already contains it. I haven't asked for gcc-5 branch yet because 
testing is still ongoing. Will send a separate mail once testing is done.

Best regards,

Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-27 11:15 Thomas Preudhomme
2017-03-30 10:55 ` Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-04 17:01   ` [PATCH, GCC/ARM, gcc-6-branch, ping2] " Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-06 13:05 ` [PATCH, GCC/ARM, gcc-6-branch] " Ramana Radhakrishnan
2017-04-06 16:38   ` Thomas Preudhomme [this message]
2017-04-10 12:12   ` [PATCH, GCC/ARM, gcc-5-branch] " Thomas Preudhomme
2017-04-11 14:47     ` Ramana Radhakrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a567d163-fe94-f10a-6c9c-379d5eb07b90@foss.arm.com \
    --to=thomas.preudhomme@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=ramana.gcc@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).