From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11461 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2017 00:07:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10370 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jun 2017 00:07:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=tongue, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mail-qt0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:07:44 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w1so42143761qtg.2 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:07:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6H/5b5OECoQTEWs+GU6FotJXGdwCCaCDWBrp49cx5Hk=; b=O29Uv/EJhQm8Q8Ie9K5pSNamCu6nnfGo1vx36giBmLglgiIY5i1RIwF+5+HLIILMvY QyNtPhOSbIHD9hVz11PUY4lpLsNKu083hJLRo2izsO3pbJNYdqthssI8O8gHKV52p7Lh rymv84VzUrdDS7zuw+4Nxvo8HXQou6y8v6fNd2+z+OjM3R3zZjHyi/ePhAivz+od5GTh zPLHNUxAZY+3g1PCLVZyeQgRMj7Umq/ORfNjRBbzr6Ag0YJ/bPMlwSR9IGpkw/HABpRT JemBDiukT2/9/UOUYYo9ltJG1htJF5HeeShYmuoW1DDO4bPeYhlS9Hk7gORhp/7cM6kT dmJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw2D9HQJtT8D9twxFWlLdnDZEn5sOStjrqeGgKXRqu4gG25EdXn NO/fKxr7O/PhPw== X-Received: by 10.200.43.168 with SMTP id m37mr9504260qtm.228.1497571667296; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (184-96-144-212.hlrn.qwest.net. [184.96.144.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o23sm596768qko.67.2017.06.15.17.07.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Canonize names of attributes. To: Jason Merrill , =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= References: Cc: gcc-patches List , Richard Biener From: Martin Sebor Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 00:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg01153.txt.bz2 On 06/14/2017 11:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> (canonize_attr_name): New function. > > I think this should be "canonicalize"; "canonize" means something else. Right. I was about to make the same observation but then grepped GCC sources for the word and found a whole bunch of existing names (besides canonize itself there's also canonize_uhwi and df_canonize_collection_rec), so I bit my tongue. Martin