From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: fix for absent array argument passed to optional dummy [PR101135]
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:32:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a63d9ea1-aa49-482c-b858-bfb31a7598a6@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24718b24-981a-730c-4cd3-b6f4727797a0@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3185 bytes --]
Dear all,
as there has been some good progress in the handling of optional dummy
arguments, I looked again at this PR and a patch for it that I withdrew
as it turned out incomplete.
It turned out that it now needs only a minor adjustment for optional
dummy arguments of procedures with bind(c) attribute so that ubsan
checking does not trigger.
Along this way I extended the previous testcase to exercise to some
extent combinations of bind(c) and non-bind(c) procedures and found
one failure (since at least gcc-9) that is genuine: passing a missing
optional from a bind(c) procedure to an assumed-rank dummy, see
PR114355. The corresponding test is commented in the testcase.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
On 2/6/22 22:04, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> Am 04.02.22 um 11:45 schrieb Mikael Morin:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 29/01/2022 à 22:41, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
>>> The least invasive change - already pointed out by the reporter - is
>>> to check the presence of the argument before dereferencing the data
>>> pointer after the offset calculation. This requires adjusting the
>>> checking pattern for gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90.
>>>
>>> Regtesting reminded me that procedures with bind(c) attribute are doing
>>> their own stuff, which is why they need to be excluded here, otherwise
>>> testcase bind-c-contiguous-4.f90 would regress on the expected output.
>
> only after submitting the patch I figured that the patch is incomplete.
>
> When we have a call chain of procedures with and without bind(c),
> there are still cases left where the failure with the sanitizer
> is not fixed. Just add "bind(c)" to subroutine test_wrapper only
> in the original PR.
>
> I have added a corresponding comment in the PR.
>
>>> There is a potential alternative solution which I did not pursue, as I
>>> think it is more invasive, but also that I didn't succeed to implement:
>>> A non-present dummy array argument should not need to get its descriptor
>>> set up. Pursuing this is probably not the right thing to do during the
>>> current stage of development and could be implemented later. If
>>> somebody
>>> believes this is important, feel free to open a PR for this.
>>>
>> I have an other (equally unimportant) concern that it may create an
>> unnecessary conditional when passing a subobject of an optional
>> argument. In that case we can assume that the optional is present.
>> It’s not a correctness issue, so let’s not bother at this stage.
>
> Judging from the dump tree of the cases I looked at I did not see
> anything that would pose a problem to the optimizer.
>
>>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
>>>
>> OK.
>
> Given my latest observations I'd rather withdraw the current version of
> the patch and rethink. I also did not see an issue with bind(c)
> procedures calling alikes.
>
> It would help if one would not only know the properties of the actual
> argument, but also of the formal one, which is not available at that
> point in the code. I'll have another look and resubmit.
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Harald
>
[-- Attachment #2: pr101135-v2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6171 bytes --]
From b3079a82a220477704f8156207239e4af4103ea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:14:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: fix for absent array argument passed to optional
dummy [PR101135]
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/101135
* trans-array.cc (gfc_get_dataptr_offset): Check for optional
arguments being present before dereferencing data pointer.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/101135
* gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90: Adjust diagnostic pattern.
* gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90: New test.
---
gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc | 11 ++
.../gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90 | 2 +-
.../ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index 3673fa40720..a7717a8107e 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -7526,6 +7526,17 @@ gfc_get_dataptr_offset (stmtblock_t *block, tree parm, tree desc, tree offset,
/* Set the target data pointer. */
offset = gfc_build_addr_expr (gfc_array_dataptr_type (desc), tmp);
+
+ /* Check for optional dummy argument being present. Arguments of BIND(C)
+ procedures are excepted here since they are handled differently. */
+ if (expr->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
+ && expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.dummy
+ && expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.optional
+ && !is_CFI_desc (NULL, expr))
+ offset = build3_loc (input_location, COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (offset),
+ gfc_conv_expr_present (expr->symtree->n.sym), offset,
+ fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (offset), gfc_index_zero_node));
+
gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (block, parm, offset);
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
index c6a79059a91..b5e1726d74d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ end program test
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "scalar2 \\(.* slr1" 1 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "= es1 != 0B" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "= es1 != 0B" 2 "original" } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "assumed_shape2 \\(es1" 0 "original" } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "explicit_shape2 \\(es1" 1 "original" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fd3914934aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original -fsanitize=undefined" }
+!
+! PR fortran/101135 - Load of null pointer when passing absent
+! assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument
+!
+! Based on testcase by Marcel Jacobse
+
+program main
+ implicit none
+ character(len=3) :: a(6) = ['abc', 'def', 'ghi', 'jlm', 'nop', 'qrs']
+ call as ()
+ call as (a(::2))
+ call as_c ()
+ call as_c (a(2::2))
+ call test_wrapper
+ call test_wrapper_c
+ call test_ar_wrapper
+ call test_ar_wrapper_c
+contains
+ subroutine as (xx)
+ character(len=*), optional, intent(in) :: xx(*)
+ if (.not. present (xx)) return
+ print *, xx(1:3)
+ end subroutine as
+
+ subroutine as_c (zz) bind(c)
+ character(len=*), optional, intent(in) :: zz(*)
+ if (.not. present (zz)) return
+ print *, zz(1:3)
+ end subroutine as_c
+
+ subroutine test_wrapper (x)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: x
+ call test (x)
+ call test1 (x)
+ call test_c (x)
+ call test1_c (x)
+ end subroutine test_wrapper
+
+ subroutine test_wrapper_c (w) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: w
+ call test (w)
+ call test1 (w)
+ call test_c (w)
+ call test1_c (w)
+ end subroutine test_wrapper_c
+
+ subroutine test (y)
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test
+
+ subroutine test_c (y) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test_c
+
+ subroutine test1 (y)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test1
+
+ subroutine test1_c (y) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test1_c
+
+ subroutine test_ar_wrapper (p, q, r)
+ real, intent(out), optional :: p
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: q
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: r
+ call test_ar (p)
+ call test_ar (q)
+ call test_ar (r)
+ call test_ar_c (p)
+ call test_ar_c (q)
+ call test_ar_c (r)
+ end subroutine test_ar_wrapper
+
+ subroutine test_ar_wrapper_c (u, v, s) bind(c)
+ real, intent(out), optional :: u
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: v
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: s
+ call test_ar (u)
+ call test_ar (v)
+! call test_ar (s) ! Disabled due to runtime segfault, see pr114355
+ call test_ar_c (u)
+ call test_ar_c (v)
+ call test_ar_c (s)
+ end subroutine test_ar_wrapper_c
+
+ subroutine test_ar (z)
+ real, dimension(..), intent(out), optional :: z
+ end subroutine test_ar
+
+ subroutine test_ar_c (z) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(..), intent(out), optional :: z
+ end subroutine test_ar_c
+end program
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = v != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = w != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = q != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = x != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = xx.0 != 0B " 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-output " abcghinop(\n|\r\n|\r)" }"
+! { dg-output " defjlmqrs(\n|\r\n|\r)" }"
--
2.35.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: Mikael Morin <morin-mikael@orange.fr>,
fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH, v2] Fortran: fix for absent array argument passed to optional dummy [PR101135]
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:32:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a63d9ea1-aa49-482c-b858-bfb31a7598a6@gmx.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240315193250.rLNVfyZtc5eKK_ytADf1IRYtCtFr54LVEkoJNx2ph4o@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24718b24-981a-730c-4cd3-b6f4727797a0@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3251 bytes --]
Dear all,
as there has been some good progress in the handling of optional dummy
arguments, I looked again at this PR and a patch for it that I withdrew
as it turned out incomplete.
It turned out that it now needs only a minor adjustment for optional
dummy arguments of procedures with bind(c) attribute so that ubsan
checking does not trigger.
Along this way I extended the previous testcase to exercise to some
extent combinations of bind(c) and non-bind(c) procedures and found
one failure (since at least gcc-9) that is genuine: passing a missing
optional from a bind(c) procedure to an assumed-rank dummy, see
PR114355. The corresponding test is commented in the testcase.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
On 2/6/22 22:04, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> Am 04.02.22 um 11:45 schrieb Mikael Morin:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 29/01/2022 à 22:41, Harald Anlauf via Fortran a écrit :
>>> The least invasive change - already pointed out by the reporter - is
>>> to check the presence of the argument before dereferencing the data
>>> pointer after the offset calculation. This requires adjusting the
>>> checking pattern for gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90.
>>>
>>> Regtesting reminded me that procedures with bind(c) attribute are doing
>>> their own stuff, which is why they need to be excluded here, otherwise
>>> testcase bind-c-contiguous-4.f90 would regress on the expected output.
>
> only after submitting the patch I figured that the patch is incomplete.
>
> When we have a call chain of procedures with and without bind(c),
> there are still cases left where the failure with the sanitizer
> is not fixed. Just add "bind(c)" to subroutine test_wrapper only
> in the original PR.
>
> I have added a corresponding comment in the PR.
>
>>> There is a potential alternative solution which I did not pursue, as I
>>> think it is more invasive, but also that I didn't succeed to implement:
>>> A non-present dummy array argument should not need to get its descriptor
>>> set up. Pursuing this is probably not the right thing to do during the
>>> current stage of development and could be implemented later. If
>>> somebody
>>> believes this is important, feel free to open a PR for this.
>>>
>> I have an other (equally unimportant) concern that it may create an
>> unnecessary conditional when passing a subobject of an optional
>> argument. In that case we can assume that the optional is present.
>> It’s not a correctness issue, so let’s not bother at this stage.
>
> Judging from the dump tree of the cases I looked at I did not see
> anything that would pose a problem to the optimizer.
>
>>> Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
>>>
>> OK.
>
> Given my latest observations I'd rather withdraw the current version of
> the patch and rethink. I also did not see an issue with bind(c)
> procedures calling alikes.
>
> It would help if one would not only know the properties of the actual
> argument, but also of the formal one, which is not available at that
> point in the code. I'll have another look and resubmit.
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> Harald
>
[-- Attachment #2: pr101135-v2.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6171 bytes --]
From b3079a82a220477704f8156207239e4af4103ea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:14:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: fix for absent array argument passed to optional
dummy [PR101135]
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/101135
* trans-array.cc (gfc_get_dataptr_offset): Check for optional
arguments being present before dereferencing data pointer.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/101135
* gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90: Adjust diagnostic pattern.
* gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90: New test.
---
gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc | 11 ++
.../gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90 | 2 +-
.../ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90 | 108 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
index 3673fa40720..a7717a8107e 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.cc
@@ -7526,6 +7526,17 @@ gfc_get_dataptr_offset (stmtblock_t *block, tree parm, tree desc, tree offset,
/* Set the target data pointer. */
offset = gfc_build_addr_expr (gfc_array_dataptr_type (desc), tmp);
+
+ /* Check for optional dummy argument being present. Arguments of BIND(C)
+ procedures are excepted here since they are handled differently. */
+ if (expr->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
+ && expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.dummy
+ && expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.optional
+ && !is_CFI_desc (NULL, expr))
+ offset = build3_loc (input_location, COND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (offset),
+ gfc_conv_expr_present (expr->symtree->n.sym), offset,
+ fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (offset), gfc_index_zero_node));
+
gfc_conv_descriptor_data_set (block, parm, offset);
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
index c6a79059a91..b5e1726d74d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/missing_optional_dummy_6a.f90
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ end program test
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "scalar2 \\(.* slr1" 1 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "= es1 != 0B" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "= es1 != 0B" 2 "original" } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "assumed_shape2 \\(es1" 0 "original" } }
! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "explicit_shape2 \\(es1" 1 "original" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fd3914934aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ubsan/missing_optional_dummy_8.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original -fsanitize=undefined" }
+!
+! PR fortran/101135 - Load of null pointer when passing absent
+! assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument
+!
+! Based on testcase by Marcel Jacobse
+
+program main
+ implicit none
+ character(len=3) :: a(6) = ['abc', 'def', 'ghi', 'jlm', 'nop', 'qrs']
+ call as ()
+ call as (a(::2))
+ call as_c ()
+ call as_c (a(2::2))
+ call test_wrapper
+ call test_wrapper_c
+ call test_ar_wrapper
+ call test_ar_wrapper_c
+contains
+ subroutine as (xx)
+ character(len=*), optional, intent(in) :: xx(*)
+ if (.not. present (xx)) return
+ print *, xx(1:3)
+ end subroutine as
+
+ subroutine as_c (zz) bind(c)
+ character(len=*), optional, intent(in) :: zz(*)
+ if (.not. present (zz)) return
+ print *, zz(1:3)
+ end subroutine as_c
+
+ subroutine test_wrapper (x)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: x
+ call test (x)
+ call test1 (x)
+ call test_c (x)
+ call test1_c (x)
+ end subroutine test_wrapper
+
+ subroutine test_wrapper_c (w) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: w
+ call test (w)
+ call test1 (w)
+ call test_c (w)
+ call test1_c (w)
+ end subroutine test_wrapper_c
+
+ subroutine test (y)
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test
+
+ subroutine test_c (y) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test_c
+
+ subroutine test1 (y)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test1
+
+ subroutine test1_c (y) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: y
+ if (present (y)) y=0.
+ end subroutine test1_c
+
+ subroutine test_ar_wrapper (p, q, r)
+ real, intent(out), optional :: p
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: q
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: r
+ call test_ar (p)
+ call test_ar (q)
+ call test_ar (r)
+ call test_ar_c (p)
+ call test_ar_c (q)
+ call test_ar_c (r)
+ end subroutine test_ar_wrapper
+
+ subroutine test_ar_wrapper_c (u, v, s) bind(c)
+ real, intent(out), optional :: u
+ real, dimension(1), intent(out), optional :: v
+ real, dimension(:), intent(out), optional :: s
+ call test_ar (u)
+ call test_ar (v)
+! call test_ar (s) ! Disabled due to runtime segfault, see pr114355
+ call test_ar_c (u)
+ call test_ar_c (v)
+ call test_ar_c (s)
+ end subroutine test_ar_wrapper_c
+
+ subroutine test_ar (z)
+ real, dimension(..), intent(out), optional :: z
+ end subroutine test_ar
+
+ subroutine test_ar_c (z) bind(c)
+ real, dimension(..), intent(out), optional :: z
+ end subroutine test_ar_c
+end program
+
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = v != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = w != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = q != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = x != 0B " 2 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "data = xx.0 != 0B " 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-output " abcghinop(\n|\r\n|\r)" }"
+! { dg-output " defjlmqrs(\n|\r\n|\r)" }"
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-29 21:41 [PATCH] PR/101135 - Load of null pointer when passing absent assumed-shape array argument for an optional dummy argument Harald Anlauf
2022-02-04 10:45 ` Mikael Morin
2022-02-06 21:04 ` Harald Anlauf
2022-02-06 21:04 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-03-15 19:32 ` Harald Anlauf [this message]
2024-03-15 19:32 ` [PATCH, v2] Fortran: fix for absent array argument passed to optional dummy [PR101135] Harald Anlauf
2024-03-17 21:04 ` Mikael Morin
2024-03-17 22:10 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-03-17 22:10 ` Harald Anlauf
2024-03-18 18:47 ` Mikael Morin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a63d9ea1-aa49-482c-b858-bfb31a7598a6@gmx.de \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).