From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=L7gV=AF=arm.com=andre.simoesdiasvieira@sourceware.org>
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BC03858C54
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:38:17 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E8BC03858C54
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C9F2F4;
	Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.57.68.11] (unknown [10.57.68.11])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04BF43F6C4;
	Fri, 14 Apr 2023 06:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <a85202d3-1fa5-23fa-e0ab-cc6772ad3f60@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:38:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix vect-simd-clone testcase dump scanning
Content-Language: en-US
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
References: <20230414094255.F02F313498@imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de>
 <ZDkh4wQR2ZM1KXqy@tucnak>
 <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2304141012340.4466@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
 <ZDkqAbHL4o6lNiHG@tucnak> <aefa0f30-6e9c-b53e-22f1-cf415af62d4e@arm.com>
 <ZDkyYxElr53XHCUn@tucnak>
From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZDkyYxElr53XHCUn@tucnak>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_NONE,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

SGTM

On 14/04/2023 12:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 11:59:02AM +0100, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> On the other thread I commented that inbranch simdclones are failing for
>> AVX512F because it sets the mask_mode, for which inbranch hasn't been
>> implemented, and so it is rejected.
> 
> But then we can as well use -mno-avx512f in dg-additional-options of the
> test and have another test copy if needed that checks -mavx512f.
> 
> 	Jakub
>