From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout2.rbg.tum.de (mailout2.rbg.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0::202]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899483854550 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:53:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 899483854550 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=in.tum.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=in.tum.de Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (mailrelay1.in.tum.de [131.159.254.14]) by mailout2.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226984C0293; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=in.tum.de; s=20220209; t=1669031583; bh=V46cqq+XzylcEsOEFk4Bz1aQroV0W/3AYtoBGgnEWgo=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Xa6YXQy0j3GgYc74EULOfb+bIL0aBB3KnTM/7TRD/x7pxPqUsZrIWpCO990aB1dNX ndcoH/Ut4I94/DyZkPGQ6jxmJ00AXQZDJ3nRGr2bbYlbA7FVMipP2yZCUvFUE1mi4B Dg4sMk/0kAJhWbZe4E64zYZ+6+MkDmdI5sIEi+qW7n+xsZjJgRbtpfNfCk3H82r19o kZnnbtBoqUGTuF13rbQj0XZQXo7t060reejcvioVk3cRwct6itUcpBvn6AMXwriKkK XIUoJU7ooeE7qm1SW8167j2ZeqLVi2PRTr549WGcIh+aI+3WdzaUnsH0lFOLyRPgSk TI0r64Me3CQzQ== Received: by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1106D1A6; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B297885; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.in.tum.de (vmrbg426.in.tum.de [131.159.0.73]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD9A722; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112) id A75BB4A034A; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:02 +0100 (CET) Received: (Authenticated sender: neumann) by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 294C94A0226; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:02 +0100 (CET) (Extended-Queue-bit xtech_qw@fff.in.tum.de) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:53:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] eliminate mutex in fast path of __register_frame Content-Language: en-US To: Tamar Christina , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jason Merrill Cc: Florian Weimer , Jakub Jelinek , Jonathan Wakely References: <2a4776b9-9271-bb3c-a626-d5ec22dae6f3@in.tum.de> From: Thomas Neumann In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > > It's easy to reproduce on x86 as well. > > As a testcase: > > #include > > int main(int argc, char** argv) { > return 0; > } > > And just compile with: g++ -O1 hello.cpp -static -o hello.exe. thanks, I will take a look. Best Thomas