From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31835 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2016 18:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31820 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2016 18:13:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mtlfep01.bell.net Received: from belmont79srvr.owm.bell.net (HELO mtlfep01.bell.net) (184.150.200.79) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:13:28 +0000 Received: from bell.net mtlfep01 184.150.200.30 by mtlfep01.bell.net with ESMTP id <20161012181326.KYYD31835.mtlfep01.bell.net@mtlspm01.bell.net> for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:13:26 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.125] (really [69.156.4.4]) by mtlspm01.bell.net with ESMTP id <20161012181326.RBDE27845.mtlspm01.bell.net@[192.168.0.125]>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 14:13:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new hook for max_align_t_align To: Florian Weimer , Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek References: <305D4697-79B3-4B69-8741-98BFC00A5ECE@bell.net> <856A3FEF-7A0D-43D4-9CBF-23939E7861C4@bell.net> <6C68EDB9-5933-4127-978E-807ABC7F31C7@bell.net> <519be582-d8e5-a6ef-f699-90a21250180b@bell.net> <88e889ee-dec9-5fef-db19-02f4d91d9156@redhat.com> <20161012072540.GJ7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <20161012080208.GK7282@tucnak.redhat.com> <6f8d9eff-adef-79a4-b67d-732106705d40@redhat.com> Cc: Carlos O'Donell , Jason Merrill , Bernd Edlinger , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: John David Anglin Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:13:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Opwv-CommTouchExtSvcRefID: str=0001.0A020202.57FE7D46.00F7,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00949.txt.bz2 On 2016-10-12 2:01 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 10/12/2016 06:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > >> If the issue is strictly limited to 32 bit hpux, then do we really care? >> Can we just deprecate that platform and thus make the issue go away? > > Are we talking about HP-XX or Linux on PA-RISC? The patch was intended to address a Linux issue on PA-RISC. On HP-UX, the current version of max_align_t is fine. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net