* [PATCH] rs6000: Fix wrong RTL patterns for vector merge high/low char on LE
@ 2024-06-24 2:23 Kewen.Lin
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kewen.Lin @ 2024-06-24 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches; +Cc: Segher Boessenkool, David Edelsohn, Peter Bergner
Hi,
Commit r12-4496 changes some define_expands and define_insns
for vector merge high/low char, which are altivec_vmrg[hl]b.
These defines are mainly for built-in function vec_merge{h,l}
and some internal gen function needs. These functions should
consider endianness, taking vec_mergeh as example, as PVIPR
defines, vec_mergeh "Merges the first halves (in element order)
of two vectors", it does note it's in element order. So it's
mapped into vmrghb on BE while vmrglb on LE respectively.
Although the mapped insns are different, as the discussion in
PR106069, the RTL pattern should be still the same, it is
conformed before commit r12-4496, but gets changed into
different patterns on BE and LE starting from commit r12-4496.
Similar to 32-bit element case in commit log of r15-1504, this
8-bit element pattern on LE doesn't actually match what the
underlying insn is intended to represent, once some optimization
like combine does some changes basing on it, it would cause
the unexpected consequence. The newly constructed test case
pr106069-1.c is a typical example for this issue.
So this patch is to fix the wrong RTL pattern, ensure the
associated RTL patterns become the same as before which can
have the same semantic as their mapped insns. With the
proposed patch, the expanders like altivec_vmrghb expands
into altivec_vmrghb_direct_be or altivec_vmrglb_direct_le
depending on endianness, "direct" can easily show which
insn would be generated, _be and _le are mainly for the
different RTL patterns as endianness.
Following [1], this one is for vector element 8-bit size,
bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P8/P9
and powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and P10.
I'm going to push this two days later if no objections, thanks!
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655239.html
Co-authored-by: Xionghu Luo <xionghuluo@tencent.com>
PR target/106069
PR target/115355
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/altivec.md (altivec_vmrghb_direct): Rename to ...
(altivec_vmrghb_direct_be): ... this. Add condition BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN.
(altivec_vmrghb_direct_le): New define_insn.
(altivec_vmrglb_direct): Rename to ...
(altivec_vmrglb_direct_be): ... this. Add condition BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN.
(altivec_vmrglb_direct_le): New define_insn.
(altivec_vmrghb): Adjust by calling gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct_be
for BE and gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct_le for LE.
(altivec_vmrglb): Adjust by calling gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct_be
for BE and gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct_le for LE.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (altivec_expand_vec_perm_const): Replace
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct by
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct_be for BE and
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct_le for LE. And replace
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct by
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct_be for BE and
CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct_le for LE.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c: New test.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md | 66 +++++++++++++++----
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 8 +--
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c | 39 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
index dcc71cc0f52..a0e8a35b843 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
@@ -1152,15 +1152,16 @@ (define_expand "altivec_vmrghb"
(use (match_operand:V16QI 2 "register_operand"))]
"TARGET_ALTIVEC"
{
- rtx (*fun) (rtx, rtx, rtx) = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct
- : gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct;
- if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
- emit_insn (fun (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
+ if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
+ emit_insn (
+ gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct_be (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
+ else
+ emit_insn (
+ gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct_le (operands[0], operands[2], operands[1]));
DONE;
})
-(define_insn "altivec_vmrghb_direct"
+(define_insn "altivec_vmrghb_direct_be"
[(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
(vec_select:V16QI
(vec_concat:V32QI
@@ -1174,7 +1175,25 @@ (define_insn "altivec_vmrghb_direct"
(const_int 5) (const_int 21)
(const_int 6) (const_int 22)
(const_int 7) (const_int 23)])))]
- "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
+ "TARGET_ALTIVEC && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
+ "vmrghb %0,%1,%2"
+ [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
+
+(define_insn "altivec_vmrghb_direct_le"
+ [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
+ (vec_select:V16QI
+ (vec_concat:V32QI
+ (match_operand:V16QI 2 "register_operand" "v")
+ (match_operand:V16QI 1 "register_operand" "v"))
+ (parallel [(const_int 8) (const_int 24)
+ (const_int 9) (const_int 25)
+ (const_int 10) (const_int 26)
+ (const_int 11) (const_int 27)
+ (const_int 12) (const_int 28)
+ (const_int 13) (const_int 29)
+ (const_int 14) (const_int 30)
+ (const_int 15) (const_int 31)])))]
+ "TARGET_ALTIVEC && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
"vmrghb %0,%1,%2"
[(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
@@ -1274,15 +1293,16 @@ (define_expand "altivec_vmrglb"
(use (match_operand:V16QI 2 "register_operand"))]
"TARGET_ALTIVEC"
{
- rtx (*fun) (rtx, rtx, rtx) = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct
- : gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct;
- if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
- std::swap (operands[1], operands[2]);
- emit_insn (fun (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
+ if (BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
+ emit_insn (
+ gen_altivec_vmrglb_direct_be (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
+ else
+ emit_insn (
+ gen_altivec_vmrghb_direct_le (operands[0], operands[2], operands[1]));
DONE;
})
-(define_insn "altivec_vmrglb_direct"
+(define_insn "altivec_vmrglb_direct_be"
[(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
(vec_select:V16QI
(vec_concat:V32QI
@@ -1296,7 +1316,25 @@ (define_insn "altivec_vmrglb_direct"
(const_int 13) (const_int 29)
(const_int 14) (const_int 30)
(const_int 15) (const_int 31)])))]
- "TARGET_ALTIVEC"
+ "TARGET_ALTIVEC && BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
+ "vmrglb %0,%1,%2"
+ [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
+
+(define_insn "altivec_vmrglb_direct_le"
+ [(set (match_operand:V16QI 0 "register_operand" "=v")
+ (vec_select:V16QI
+ (vec_concat:V32QI
+ (match_operand:V16QI 2 "register_operand" "v")
+ (match_operand:V16QI 1 "register_operand" "v"))
+ (parallel [(const_int 0) (const_int 16)
+ (const_int 1) (const_int 17)
+ (const_int 2) (const_int 18)
+ (const_int 3) (const_int 19)
+ (const_int 4) (const_int 20)
+ (const_int 5) (const_int 21)
+ (const_int 6) (const_int 22)
+ (const_int 7) (const_int 23)])))]
+ "TARGET_ALTIVEC && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN"
"vmrglb %0,%1,%2"
[(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 2046a831938..8e46cf19907 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -23442,8 +23442,8 @@ altivec_expand_vec_perm_const (rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1,
CODE_FOR_altivec_vpkuwum_direct,
{2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31}},
{OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC,
- BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct
- : CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct,
+ BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct_be
+ : CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct_le,
{0, 16, 1, 17, 2, 18, 3, 19, 4, 20, 5, 21, 6, 22, 7, 23}},
{OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC,
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghh_direct
@@ -23454,8 +23454,8 @@ altivec_expand_vec_perm_const (rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1,
: CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglw_direct_v4si_le,
{0, 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23}},
{OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC,
- BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct
- : CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct,
+ BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglb_direct_be
+ : CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrghb_direct_le,
{8, 24, 9, 25, 10, 26, 11, 27, 12, 28, 13, 29, 14, 30, 15, 31}},
{OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC,
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? CODE_FOR_altivec_vmrglh_direct
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4945d8fedfb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106069-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vmx_hw } */
+
+/* Test vector merge for 8-bit element size,
+ it will abort if the RTL pattern isn't expected. */
+
+#include "altivec.h"
+
+__attribute__((noipa))
+signed char elem_6 (vector signed char a, vector signed char b)
+{
+ vector signed char c = vec_mergeh (a,b);
+ return vec_extract (c, 6);
+}
+
+__attribute__((noipa))
+unsigned char elem_15 (vector unsigned char a, vector unsigned char b)
+{
+ vector unsigned char c = vec_mergel (a,b);
+ return vec_extract (c, 15);
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ vector unsigned char v1
+ = {3, 33, 22, 12, 34, 14, 5, 25, 30, 11, 0, 21, 17, 27, 38, 8};
+ vector unsigned char v2
+ = {81, 82, 83, 84, 68, 67, 66, 65, 99, 100, 101, 102, 250, 125, 0, 6};
+ signed char x1 = elem_6 ((vector signed char) v1, (vector signed char) v2);
+ unsigned char x2 = elem_15 (v1, v2);
+
+ if (x1 != 12 || x2 != 6)
+ __builtin_abort ();
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-06-24 15:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-24 2:23 [PATCH] rs6000: Fix wrong RTL patterns for vector merge high/low char on LE Kewen.Lin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).