From: Torbjorn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] analyzer: deal with -fshort-enums
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 17:21:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9a11a34-902b-4b73-ad3a-c36917fd75eb@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f41ffed3ecabba76b82af8b26d03b0bb996a21e3.camel@redhat.com>
Hi,
Is it okay to backport 3cbab07b08d2f3a3ed34b6ec12e67727c59d285c to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see these failures on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-1.c (test for bogus messages, line 26)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-1.c (test for bogus messages, line 44)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-2.c (test for bogus messages, line 34)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-enum-2.c (test for bogus messages, line 52)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/switch-enum-pr105273-doom-p_floor.c -O0
(test for bogus messages, line 82)
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/switch-enum-pr105273-doom-p_maputl.c -O0
(test for bogus messages, line 83)
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-12-06 23:22, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 02:31 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Nov 22, 2023, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, nice, that's a great idea, I wish I'd thought of that! Will
>>> do.
>>
>> Sorry it took me so long, here it is. I added two tests, so that,
>> regardless of the defaults, we get both circumstances tested, without
>> repetition.
>>
>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Also tested on arm-eabi. Ok to
>> install?
>
> Thanks for the updated patch.
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Dave
>
>>
>>
>> analyzer: deal with -fshort-enums
>>
>> On platforms that enable -fshort-enums by default, various switch-
>> enum
>> analyzer tests fail, because apply_constraints_for_gswitch doesn't
>> expect the integral promotion type cast. I've arranged for the code
>> to cope with those casts.
>>
>>
>> for gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog
>>
>> * region-model.cc (has_nondefault_case_for_value_p): Take
>> enumerate type as a parameter.
>> (region_model::apply_constraints_for_gswitch): Cope with
>> integral promotion type casts.
>>
>> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>> * gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-1.c: New.
>> * gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-enum-1.c: New.
>> ---
>> gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc | 27 +++-
>> .../gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-enum-1.c | 141
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-1.c | 140
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-
>> enum-1.c
>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-
>> 1.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc b/gcc/analyzer/region-
>> model.cc
>> index 2157ad2578b85..6a7a8bc9f4884 100644
>> --- a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
>> @@ -5387,10 +5387,10 @@ has_nondefault_case_for_value_p (const
>> gswitch *switch_stmt, tree int_cst)
>> has nondefault cases handling all values in the enum. */
>>
>> static bool
>> -has_nondefault_cases_for_all_enum_values_p (const gswitch
>> *switch_stmt)
>> +has_nondefault_cases_for_all_enum_values_p (const gswitch
>> *switch_stmt,
>> + tree type)
>> {
>> gcc_assert (switch_stmt);
>> - tree type = TREE_TYPE (gimple_switch_index (switch_stmt));
>> gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE);
>>
>> for (tree enum_val_iter = TYPE_VALUES (type);
>> @@ -5426,6 +5426,23 @@ apply_constraints_for_gswitch (const
>> switch_cfg_superedge &edge,
>> {
>> tree index = gimple_switch_index (switch_stmt);
>> const svalue *index_sval = get_rvalue (index, ctxt);
>> + bool check_index_type = true;
>> +
>> + /* With -fshort-enum, there may be a type cast. */
>> + if (ctxt && index_sval->get_kind () == SK_UNARYOP
>> + && TREE_CODE (index_sval->get_type ()) == INTEGER_TYPE)
>> + {
>> + const unaryop_svalue *unaryop = as_a <const unaryop_svalue *>
>> (index_sval);
>> + if (unaryop->get_op () == NOP_EXPR
>> + && is_a <const initial_svalue *> (unaryop->get_arg ()))
>> + if (const initial_svalue *initvalop = (as_a <const
>> initial_svalue *>
>> + (unaryop->get_arg
>> ())))
>> + if (TREE_CODE (initvalop->get_type ()) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
>> + {
>> + index_sval = initvalop;
>> + check_index_type = false;
>> + }
>> + }
>>
>> /* If we're switching based on an enum type, assume that the user
>> is only
>> working with values from the enum. Hence if this is an
>> @@ -5437,12 +5454,14 @@ apply_constraints_for_gswitch (const
>> switch_cfg_superedge &edge,
>> ctxt
>> /* Must be an enum value. */
>> && index_sval->get_type ()
>> - && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (index)) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
>> + && (!check_index_type
>> + || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (index)) == ENUMERAL_TYPE)
>> && TREE_CODE (index_sval->get_type ()) == ENUMERAL_TYPE
>> /* If we have a constant, then we can check it directly. */
>> && index_sval->get_kind () != SK_CONSTANT
>> && edge.implicitly_created_default_p ()
>> - && has_nondefault_cases_for_all_enum_values_p (switch_stmt)
>> + && has_nondefault_cases_for_all_enum_values_p (switch_stmt,
>> + index_sval-
>>> get_type ())
>> /* Don't do this if there's a chance that the index is
>> attacker-controlled. */
>> && !ctxt->possibly_tainted_p (index_sval))
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-enum-1.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-enum-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..98f6d91f97481
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-no-short-enum-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-short-enums" } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "default" { ! short_enums } } */
>> +
>> +#include "analyzer-decls.h"
>> +
>> +/* Verify the handling of "switch (enum_value)". */
>> +
>> +enum e
>> +{
>> + E_VAL0,
>> + E_VAL1,
>> + E_VAL2
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Verify that we assume that "switch (enum)" doesn't follow
>> implicit
>> + "default" if all enum values have cases */
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_implicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + return 1945;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_implicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + int result;
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + result = 1066;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + result = 1776;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + result = 1945;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return result; /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Verify that we consider paths that use the implicit default when
>> not
>> + all enum values are covered by cases. */
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_implicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x) /* { dg-message "following 'default:' branch" } */
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_implicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + int result;
>> + switch (x) /* { dg-message "following 'default:' branch" } */
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + result = 1066;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + result = 1776;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return result; /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Verify that explicit "default" isn't rejected. */
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_explicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + return 1945;
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_explicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + default:
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_explicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 1945;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_just_default (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 42;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-1.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..384113fde5cbf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/switch-short-enum-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-additional-options "-fshort-enums" } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "default" { short_enums } } */
>> +
>> +#include "analyzer-decls.h"
>> +
>> +/* Verify the handling of "switch (enum_value)". */
>> +
>> +enum e
>> +{
>> + E_VAL0,
>> + E_VAL1,
>> + E_VAL2
>> +};
>> +
>> +/* Verify that we assume that "switch (enum)" doesn't follow
>> implicit
>> + "default" if all enum values have cases */
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_implicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + return 1945;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_implicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + int result;
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + result = 1066;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + result = 1776;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + result = 1945;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return result; /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Verify that we consider paths that use the implicit default when
>> not
>> + all enum values are covered by cases. */
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_implicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x) /* { dg-message "following 'default:' branch" } */
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_implicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + int result;
>> + switch (x) /* { dg-message "following 'default:' branch" } */
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + result = 1066;
>> + break;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + result = 1776;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return result; /* { dg-warning "uninitialized" } */
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Verify that explicit "default" isn't rejected. */
>> +
>> +int test_all_values_covered_explicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + case E_VAL2:
>> + return 1945;
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_explicit_default_1 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + default:
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_missing_values_explicit_default_2 (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + case E_VAL0:
>> + return 1066;
>> + case E_VAL1:
>> + return 1776;
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 1945;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int test_just_default (enum e x)
>> +{
>> + switch (x)
>> + {
>> + default:
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-message "path" } */
>> + return 42;
>> + }
>> + __analyzer_dump_path (); /* { dg-bogus "path" } */
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-19 7:39 Alexandre Oliva
2023-11-20 22:32 ` David Malcolm
2023-11-22 7:58 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-12-06 5:31 ` Alexandre Oliva
2023-12-06 22:22 ` David Malcolm
2024-02-07 16:21 ` Torbjorn SVENSSON [this message]
2024-02-22 8:51 ` [PING] " Torbjorn SVENSSON
2024-03-08 9:14 ` [PING^2] " Torbjorn SVENSSON
2024-03-15 10:32 ` [PING^3] " Torbjorn SVENSSON
2024-03-25 14:59 ` [PING^4] " Yvan ROUX - foss
2024-04-10 13:23 ` [PING^5] " Torbjorn SVENSSON
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9a11a34-902b-4b73-ad3a-c36917fd75eb@foss.st.com \
--to=torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=yvan.roux@foss.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).