public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches Paul A Clarke via <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [GCC 13][PATCH] PR101836: Add a new option -fstrict-flex-array[=n] and use it in __builtin_object_size
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:14:46 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ac0f0c-b94c-f38a-a036-af54645653a3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529B0DDA-852A-4E32-AF69-67080A7FEFD6@oracle.com>

On 6/28/22 13:01, Qing Zhao wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 28, 2022, at 2:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 06:29:01PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 28, 2022, at 2:22 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 06:15:58PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>>>> Because the flag just tells whether some array shouldn't be treated as (poor man's)
>>>>>> flexible array member.  We still need to find out if some FIELD_DECL is to
>>>>>> be treated like a flexible array member, which is a minority of
>>>>>> COMPONENT_REFs.
>>>>>> struct S { int a; char b[0]; int c; } s;
>>>>>> struct T { int d; char e[]; };
>>>>>> struct U { int f; struct T g; int h; } u;
>>>>>> Neither s.b nor u.g.e is to be treated like flexible array member,
>>>>>> no matter what -fstrict-flex-array= option is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then, to resolve this issue, we might need a opposite  flag DECL_IS_FLEXARRAY in FIELD_DECL?
>>>>>
>>>>> The default is FALSE for all FIELD_DECL.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't matter whether it is positive or negative, you still need to analyze
>>>> it.  See the above example.  If you have struct T t; and test t.e, then it
>>>> is flexarray.  But u.g.e is not, even when the COMPONENT_REF refers to the
>>>> same FIELD_DECL.  In the t.e case e is the very last field, in the latter
>>>> case u.g.e is the last field in struct T, but struct U has the h field after
>>>
>>> So, do you mean that the current FE analysis will not be able to decide whether a specific array field is at the end of the enclosing structure?
>>> Only the middle end can decide this ?
>>
>> Well, anything that analyzes it, can be in the FE or middle-end, but there
>> is no place to store it for later.
> 
> Then I am a little confused:
> 
> If the FE can decide wether an array field is at the end of the enclosing structure,  then combined with whether it’s a [0], [1] or [], and which level of -fstrict-flex-array,
> 
> The FE should be able to decide whether this array field is a flexible array member or not, then set the flag DECL_IS_FLEXARRAY (or DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY).
> 
> The new flag is the place to store such info, right?
> Do I miss anything here?

I think the problem is that there is just one FIELD_DECL for member
M of a given type T but there can be more than one instance of that
member, one in each struct that has a subobject of T as its own
member.  Whether M is or isn't a (valid) flexible array member
varies between the two instances.

Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27 14:19 Qing Zhao
2022-06-28  7:16 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-28 15:03   ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-28 15:08     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-28 15:59       ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-28 16:43         ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-28 18:15           ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-28 18:22             ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-28 18:29               ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-28 18:49                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-28 19:01                   ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-29 21:14                     ` Martin Sebor [this message]
2022-06-30 14:07                       ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-30 14:24                         ` Richard Biener
2022-06-30 15:31                           ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-30 17:03                             ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-30 19:30                               ` Qing Zhao
2022-07-01  6:49                                 ` Richard Biener
2022-07-01 12:55                                   ` Qing Zhao
2022-07-01 12:58                                     ` Richard Biener
2022-07-01 13:40                                       ` Qing Zhao
2022-07-01 12:59                                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 14:01                                       ` Qing Zhao
2022-07-01 15:32                                         ` Martin Sebor
2022-07-04  6:49                                           ` Richard Biener
2022-07-06 14:20                                             ` Qing Zhao
2022-07-07  8:02                                               ` Richard Biener
2022-07-07 13:33                                                 ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-29 20:45           ` Qing Zhao
2022-06-28 16:21   ` Martin Sebor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9ac0f0c-b94c-f38a-a036-af54645653a3@gmail.com \
    --to=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).