From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66070 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2017 10:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 65455 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2017 10:42:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=mingw, mingw32, H*RU:74.125.82.196, emphasize X-HELO: mail-ot0-f196.google.com Received: from mail-ot0-f196.google.com (HELO mail-ot0-f196.google.com) (74.125.82.196) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:42:26 +0000 Received: by mail-ot0-f196.google.com with SMTP id t47so957065ota.0 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:42:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4NFXtQt3Pb+2+r/C7YID5LzvUz3EtoD6ie7iQPCnZng=; b=KfcPvvb0pW9Gfm6VLSZ+v3PCYxmGBs6A6fQL/Jh5JNGJnHDnijN4jvNoehLwu5UCwr ujfcwdw691739IqeSbpW494wY7GcF2MXWHUrPYgxYH1KKrI98O4EYNPPe5efjrIGKm+o vjOEzsuM5j1vj2qiFFUVbrN/iX+8OgmRbGN5LCIs+BCiyAVNP8ufIEHMgs38XE2t1KLg 8McAwqGE6YTakL3WEBzviUUuh+2hJI2CjuJ3qzxI0K04BXcMj+1SCH8QJpJTK7KDIgMD Bq+VCnuybWgtlxtm8XJiRmFKWBZUOE87wby5wk+IIEyihFm4PbRtHRa2EBGUbhhVY3Fn I4HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k3cK30oKdNW6873+/W7fZGYHaYBq8T7Y79RJpjtjUr/mv3SV9/q9z4wpCWZ9FI0w== X-Received: by 10.84.138.165 with SMTP id 34mr35841654plp.37.1487068945010; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:42:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:e68:4074:4857:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a? ([2001:e68:4074:4857:f64d:30ff:fe63:5a5a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm473421pfg.76.2017.02.14.02.42.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 02:42:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH, GCC/x86 mingw32] Add configure option to force wildcard behavior on Windows To: Thomas Preudhomme , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <3c3cd900-7d38-a66d-d306-12c968d26f0b@gmail.com> <35f8542e-df08-62ac-da0e-824a974b96e6@foss.arm.com> <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q56NOrB1i1XT3WLNVW0WBagpcVguT3lBL" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-02/txt/msg00894.txt.bz2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Q56NOrB1i1XT3WLNVW0WBagpcVguT3lBL Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="pjqLsFVDDRatsolwPDcqH1kfXXeLlKssu" From: JonY <10walls@gmail.com> To: Thomas Preudhomme , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, GCC/x86 mingw32] Add configure option to force wildcard behavior on Windows References: <3c3cd900-7d38-a66d-d306-12c968d26f0b@gmail.com> <35f8542e-df08-62ac-da0e-824a974b96e6@foss.arm.com> <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> --pjqLsFVDDRatsolwPDcqH1kfXXeLlKssu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 628 On 02/14/2017 09:32 AM, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: >> >> Looks good, be sure to emphasize this option affects mingw hosted GCC >> only, not the compiler output. >=20 > I think that should be pretty clear in the latest version of the patch, > doc/install.texi contains: >=20 > "Note that this option only affects wildcard expansion for GCC itself.=20 > It does > not affect wildcard expansion of executables built by the resulting GCC." >=20 > If you think a part of that sentence is still confusing please let me > know and I'll improve it. >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Thomas >=20 Yes, that should be good, no more objections. --pjqLsFVDDRatsolwPDcqH1kfXXeLlKssu-- --Q56NOrB1i1XT3WLNVW0WBagpcVguT3lBL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 829 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIvBAEBCAAZBQJYot8BEhwxMHdhbGxzQGdtYWlsLmNvbQAKCRBxO1/inBRdRX9o D/9uHJTe4sMBBOfQ+8BCaT7aN+x6IZPFVSpna+aGpk3/+2Afv07TIpBkYq+jEXwq Kp3OBiJmkK83XJb44Ka9S/HZoJv9Pkoyw0OyMhVfGM+Wrve7YcyDP01sqxvPYPo5 xawp6m2LcmE+7TjXZ0yWFGQdKTS260t/OhfcT0+vVDxc/AxPxJ7PXp2n7HGjdnpU 9qAd+TGVNKdYRQOSabGRT4lqICtUG8IfBB4nzdRIvdZMzptL98+8iVvetb/LJKaS acZjrtStpOvnE5i7ToXd9Lh0TTdm8O7W3uzKMfGCbITXSkIPBqSgrmN35RlCE93J rOo6c8SCuBqPwxpjypGPiGm3/eOppTs5XELqR2+9lklqaDavUMEqFNXzYzHJvV1+ IhjLHHOX3YkxDwO7Tfz7Ht+lz7pacVNZtO9EU+XkS/SkAjwkuud/gMat1sAyQsiI dfWbXBGIFlK4udwOgXdJAxe7g/JCdmqd2vzIvH7s3dS/YBSqHlzOUO34nmMDZsiA +M4+X0jy+kYHtz1158Iaaqi8hPwHO+DCh6nQvPbT0TvRbQ31gs2dQOSopjQYCRgH heto/JjQ4uryOyweQ6CTEqTrgBaz1JpVund9I66YxaANP1emfnlWLG279KPG4n6P +47Xv2YrTjm7QlFj+ZWpJ8UjMIgcUOXx41bIajpF5rWotA== =FLfI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q56NOrB1i1XT3WLNVW0WBagpcVguT3lBL--