From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106754 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2017 18:31:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 106745 invoked by uid 89); 20 Nov 2017 18:31:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mail-qt0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:31:42 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w10so3967586qtb.10 for ; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:31:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=igs8t2tF4XoshmsgLCpiTW5wwjs+0fdDue7N3ZZYl7c=; b=LyeGrPSBSubcScix9qodi0ffo17JYIcHTLnzGrS/b4R1OzK5cVYVZlbYQMpMp16xub b06LIwi+OWQl9KXwWQeV9Vs7WEOpPRfaZY0EXjPA4LQkafYTKWXdNcmUuV2FpJfK4UFm Mym/x/1EKjtJS1H8TZ6I6ZHey9ggh2qNA0XqAesi5vHzv3qpvSpDMyQffS+y5KF+Be8X oS7agYqRnBhLfMmEh6SgVcnibxaLFlSMqt/VTsXFvEvaHqDGU4ARqryb55U8EHwBe7nU b1EAYsGwVTbE6fOE65IfXJ4vvKjhrysxnE/ie56NNjfAcwRW8HAGtJ1vp2Djrq+PhSvG QZvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4oGFz5qIgIcqt2rRGR8W7MQgNEJyh2hgo5G+fTP5y/ZMt59j3f sbgZErXG0nvLsdDULBItMx8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ/JSCQt+X/HmVtT+qC18nDoz0PuFBqjgQ+/bDMEkDz0eaaN2SOskJq5eoBP093CxUAJJOXOg== X-Received: by 10.200.42.104 with SMTP id l37mr21852202qtl.73.1511202700666; Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:31:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:7500:e7fb:4a6f:2254? ([2620:10d:c091:200::1:d87d]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm7640693qta.97.2017.11.20.10.31.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:31:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Patch ping To: Jakub Jelinek , Jason Merrill Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20171120075512.GE14653@tucnak> From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171120075512.GE14653@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg01799.txt.bz2 On 11/20/2017 02:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg00851.html > C++2A P0428R2 - familiar template syntax for generic lambdas Are there existing testcases checking this is permitted w/o warning under the appropriate circumstances? That seems to be the only thing missing from the patch itself. Otherwise ok. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell