From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8CF388211C; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 18:33:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DD8CF388211C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DD8CF388211C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718390022; cv=none; b=rs2pcI1AonKDg17N49inMa+ucA6Igt3gkgmBcgu2LDe3kC8lc7iNzckawuoi9bMY7chDHjh4+yklPnE+h3MyJDRM7zCfjupzZEW/9SdOkjTIeVojLbqnv5Q1Ke2JNjxA2/HwzjG86wVC30I7vyG77fHwyozfAudKY1+L1+pho84= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718390022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oLz5NtiwCaG0V2EcG6W9KvzMXFIk24z0H+pyfGvuC/g=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=HVOzursZnGV2hlZMsH8u3K0VKvKKivnFn231j04M0ChMPtEzNHC2WzTpfmWs7Bp6WxyD1WZn7fIMM7s7EWHSKsebRI40rJ/QKBd9lUodW9kQzsQjy7EGygVVEhTAYbO6yXm71ZSmQCSbgoPVKQ5dwHy9G0BUneQWolSW69upaQY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1718390019; bh=oLz5NtiwCaG0V2EcG6W9KvzMXFIk24z0H+pyfGvuC/g=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EAh96DfU1elWlsqS99TCXt2+2i5sag5U4//E2jPWim7ngZP0JXN1q9WCzI0scoUe0 lekzmeYjxbXVkwlM6IWfq0/ClSHQOMD4T/aaRO+nK20qERKgkjlcqj0/1C1rhzXvlN MDsMFWO0J334RQP1s7yFIuwNsDSglcZscEntj6S8= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79EDA675A1; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:33:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] middle-end/114189 - drop uses of vcond{,u,eq}_optab From: Xi Ruoyao To: Richard Biener , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: hongtao.liu@intel.com, ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr, krebbel@linux.ibm.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org, syq@gcc.gnu.org, xuchenghua@loongson.cn, ams@baylibre.com, richard.sandiford@arm.com, richard.earnshaw@arm.com Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:33:35 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20240614103115.1DB0213AB1@imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org> References: <20240614103115.1DB0213AB1@imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, 2024-06-14 at 12:31 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > The following retires vcond{,u,eq} optabs by stopping to use them > from the middle-end.=C2=A0 Targets instead (should) implement vcond_mask > and vec_cmp{,u,eq} optabs.=C2=A0 The PR this change refers to lists > possibly affected targets - those implementing these patterns, > and in particular it lists mips, sparc and ia64 as targets that > most definitely will regress while others might simply remove > their vcond{,u,eq} patterns. >=20 > I'd appreciate testing, I do not expect fallout for x86 or arm/aarch64. > I know riscv doesn't implement any of the legacy optabs.=C2=A0 But less > maintained vector targets might need adjustments. No new test failures on LoongArch. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University