From: Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"bergner@linux.ibm.com" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] rs6000, remove vector set and vector init built-ins.
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 17:29:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <add71cae-38f3-458f-bf5b-0df3fd0fd5cf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3e997a4-88f3-a6e0-d3b8-831dd990fef8@linux.ibm.com>
Kewen:
On 5/13/24 22:44, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> perform the same operation as setting a specific element in the vector in
>> C code. For example:
>>
>> src_v4si = __builtin_vec_set_v4si (src_v4si, int_val, index);
>> src_v4si[index] = int_val;
>>
>> The built-in actually generates more instructions than the inline C code
>> with no optimization but is identical with -O3 optimizations.
>>
>> All of the above built-ins that are removed do not have test cases and
>> are not documented.
>>
>> Built-ins __builtin_vec_set_v1ti __builtin_vec_set_v2di,
>> __builtin_vec_set_v2df are not removed as they are used in function
>> resolve_vec_insert() in file rs6000-c.cc.
> I think we can replace these calls with the equivalent gimple codes
> (early expanding it) and then we can get rid of these instances.
Hmm, going to need a little coaching here. I am not sure how to do this. Looks like I get to lean some something new.
Carl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 21:04 [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_cmple* builtins Carl Love
2024-05-13 6:28 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 8:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:18 ` Carl Love
2024-05-27 1:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/13] rs6000, fix error in unsigned vector float to unsigned int built-in definitions Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:00 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/13] rs6000, extend the current vec_{un,}signed{e,o} built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:53 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-17 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-05-20 1:10 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 5/13] rs6000, remove duplicated built-ins of vecmergl and vec_mergeh Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:06 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 6/13] rs6000, add overloaded vec_sel with int128 arguments Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:54 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-22 0:13 ` Carl Love
2024-05-22 3:05 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 7/13] rs6000, remove the vec_xxsel built-ins, they are duplicates Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:55 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 8/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_vperm_* built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:59 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 9/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 3:01 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 10/13] rs6000, extend vec_xxpermdi built-in for __int128 args Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:14 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 11/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp_p built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 12/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:37 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 18:21 ` Carl Love
2024-05-24 10:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 15:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 13/13] rs6000, remove vector set and vector init built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:44 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 0:29 ` Carl Love [this message]
2024-05-23 2:27 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-10 15:15 ` [PING} Re: [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=add71cae-38f3-458f-bf5b-0df3fd0fd5cf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=cel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).