From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13711 invoked by alias); 3 May 2017 04:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13691 invoked by uid 89); 3 May 2017 04:32:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:D*googlemail.com X-HELO: sasl.smtp.pobox.com Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (HELO sasl.smtp.pobox.com) (64.147.108.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 May 2017 04:32:12 +0000 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EF28D2EF; Wed, 3 May 2017 00:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312038D2EE; Wed, 3 May 2017 00:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [76.215.41.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5203D8D2EC; Wed, 3 May 2017 00:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/12] [i386] Improve 64-bit Microsoft to System V ABI pro/epilogues To: Kai Tietz , JonY <10walls@gmail.com> References: <49e81c0b-07a4-22df-d7c3-2439177ac7cf@pobox.com> Cc: Uros Bizjak , gcc-patches , Jan Hubicka From: Daniel Santos Message-ID: Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 06:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 79C93A42-2FB9-11E7-936B-E680B56B9B0B-06139138!pb-smtp1.pobox.com X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 On 05/02/2017 05:40 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > Right, and Wine people will tell, if something doesn't work for them. > So ok for me too. > > Kai Yes, and I although I haven't repeated the Wine tests in a few months, little has changed since my last run. I'll be running them again soon anyway. Daniel