[wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[Segher Boessenkool]

We haven't had Sender: for a while now.  Use the standard List-Id:
header in its place.

Committed.


Segher
---
 htdocs/lists.html | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/htdocs/lists.html b/htdocs/lists.html
index 42a44ab83d9b..4ac5d5a84cd1 100644
--- a/htdocs/lists.html
+++ b/htdocs/lists.html
@@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ with enough prodding, that sending mail to the address listed in
 <h2>Filtering</h2>
 
 <p>If you want to use procmail or similar tools to process the GCC
-mailing lists, you can filter using the Sender: header, as well as all
-of the RFC2369 headers (List-Subscribe, List-Unsubscribe, List-Post,
+mailing lists, you can filter using the List-Id: header from RFC2919, as well
+as all of the RFC2369 headers (List-Subscribe, List-Unsubscribe, List-Post,
 List-Archive, etc.).</p>
 
 <p>For example, the following procmail rule will sort all mail from
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ our lists into a single folder named INLIST.gcc:</p>
 
 <blockquote><p><code>
 :0<br />
-* ^Sender: .*-owner@gcc.gnu.org<br />
+* ^List-Id: .*<.*@gcc.gnu.org>$<br />
 INLIST.gcc<br />
 </code></p></blockquote>
 
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ can use the following recipe (Use at your own risk!):</p>
 
 <blockquote><p><code>
 :0 Wh: msgid.lock<br />
-* ^Sender: .*-owner@gcc.gnu.org<br />
+* ^List-Id: .*<.*@gcc.gnu.org>$<br />
 | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
 </code></p></blockquote>
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[Andreas Schwab]

On Jun 01 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:

> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ our lists into a single folder named INLIST.gcc:</p>
>  
>  <blockquote><p><code>
>  :0<br />
> -* ^Sender: .*-owner@gcc.gnu.org<br />
> +* ^List-Id: .*<.*@gcc.gnu.org>$<br />

That will never match.

List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510  2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."

Re: [wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Tue, 1 Jun 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> We haven't had Sender: for a while now. 

"a while now" was about four(?) hours when you sent that yesterday. :-)

I know since I still had been using that and was looking for all my
missing gcc-related mails yesterday afternoon.  Thanks for spotting 
this and this change!

Gerald

Re: [wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[Segher Boessenkool]

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:44:34AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > We haven't had Sender: for a while now. 
> 
> "a while now" was about four(?) hours when you sent that yesterday. :-)

Ah, I thought it was since we moved to the new mailing list software.
I have used List-Id: in my procmailrcs since much longer, so I did not
notice the recent change (but irc did :-) )


Segher

Re: [wwwdocs] lists: Correct procmail recipe

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> On Tue, 1 Jun 2021, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > We haven't had Sender: for a while now.
>
> "a while now" was about four(?) hours when you sent that yesterday. :-)
>
> I know since I still had been using that and was looking for all my
> missing gcc-related mails yesterday afternoon.  Thanks for spotting
> this and this change!

JFTR, nitpickish: I still get a "Sender:" field (obviously
generated at gcc.gnu.org), just not matching that format.

brgds, H-P