From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arjuna.pair.com (arjuna.pair.com [209.68.5.131]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E423858D1E for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 02:56:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 40E423858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bitrange.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bitrange.com Received: by arjuna.pair.com (Postfix, from userid 3006) id D63328A799; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arjuna.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36668A780; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:56:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:56:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@arjuna.pair.com To: Xi Ruoyao cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Lulu Cheng , Youling Tang , Chenghua Xu , Huacai Chen , Jinyang He , Wang Xuerui Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] LoongArch: add addr_global attribute In-Reply-To: <6529f5cf76e4df3cdfb6c85ea9da962797f97437.camel@xry111.site> Message-ID: References: <6529f5cf76e4df3cdfb6c85ea9da962797f97437.camel@xry111.site> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.16 (BSF 172 2016-09-29) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 209.68.5.131 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 02:56:02 -0000 On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote: > Can we make a final solution to this soon? Now the merge window of > Linux 6.0 is closed and we have two Linux kernel releases not possible > to be built with Binutils or GCC with new relocation types. This is > just ugly... > > On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 17:17 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Gcc-patches wrote: > > v5 -> v6: > > > > * still use "addr_global" as we don't have a better name. "far"? brgds, H-P