From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16787 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2013 16:55:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 16752 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2013 16:55:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:06 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Tthsn-0002Yy-Gg from Maciej_Rozycki@mentor.com ; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:55:05 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:55:05 -0800 Received: from [172.30.3.174] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:00 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:55:00 -0000 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Richard Sandiford CC: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?J=FCrgen_Urban?= , , Subject: Re: Support for MIPS r5900 In-Reply-To: <87txqovylj.fsf@sandifor-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20130106225645.190700@gmx.net> <87y5g43bkf.fsf@talisman.default> <20130108223433.27430@gmx.net> <87txqovylj.fsf@sandifor-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00617.txt.bz2 On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote: > BTW Maciej, sorry to be prickly about this, but: where I live, "I insist" > has a very domineering ring to it, at least in this kind of context. > The implication tends to be that "having insisted, I really expect it to > happen, simply because it is _I_ who insisted". Maybe it's not the same > everywhere though. That's probably a shortcoming of my English skills -- sorry about that -- I didn't want to sound impolite or to insult anyone, especially you, Jürgen. Your contribution is very welcome even if there are minor issues there or some design decisions are not immediately obvious to everyone. Please feel free to disagree or argue if you think any opinion expressed does not convince you. Maciej